You are not logged in.

Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity

Macdonald, Graham Z., Button, Duane C., Drinkwater, Eric J. and Behm, David George 2014, Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity, Medicine & science in sports & exercise, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 131-142, doi: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a123db.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Foam rolling as a recovery tool after an intense bout of physical activity
Author(s) Macdonald, Graham Z.
Button, Duane C.
Drinkwater, Eric J.ORCID iD for Drinkwater, Eric J. orcid.org/0000-0002-9594-9360
Behm, David George
Journal name Medicine & science in sports & exercise
Volume number 46
Issue number 1
Start page 131
End page 142
Total pages 12
Publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
Place of publication Philadelphia, Pa.
Publication date 2014-01
ISSN 1530-0315
Keyword(s) Adult
Humans
Male
Motor Activity
Muscle Contraction
Muscle, Skeletal
Myalgia
Physical Therapy Modalities
Range of Motion, Articular
Resistance Training
Thigh
Young Adult
Summary PURPOSE: The objective of this study is to understand the effectiveness of foam rolling (FR) as a recovery tool after exercise-induced muscle damage, analyzing thigh girth, muscle soreness, range of motion (ROM), evoked and voluntary contractile properties, vertical jump, perceived pain while FR, and force placed on the foam roller. METHODS: Twenty male subjects (≥3 yr of strength training experience) were randomly assigned into the control (n = 10) or FR (n = 10) group. All the subjects followed the same testing protocol. The subjects participated in five testing sessions: 1) orientation and one-repetition maximum back squat, 2) pretest measurements, 10 × 10 squat protocol, and POST-0 (posttest 0) measurements, along with measurements at 3) POST-24, 4) POST-48, and 5) POST-72. The only between-group difference was that the FR group performed a 20-min FR exercise protocol at the end of each testing session (POST-0, POST-24, and POST-48). RESULTS: FR substantially reduced muscle soreness at all time points while substantially improving ROM. FR negatively affected evoked contractile properties with the exception of half relaxation time and electromechanical delay (EMD), with FR substantially improving EMD. Voluntary contractile properties showed no substantial between-group differences for all measurements besides voluntary muscle activation and vertical jump, with FR substantially improving muscle activation at all time points and vertical jump at POST-48. When performing the five FR exercises, measurements of the subjects' force placed on the foam roller and perceived pain while FR ranged between 26 and 46 kg (32%-55% body weight) and 2.5 and 7.5 points, respectively. CONCLUSION: The most important findings of the present study were that FR was beneficial in attenuating muscle soreness while improving vertical jump height, muscle activation, and passive and dynamic ROM in comparison with control. FR negatively affected several evoked contractile properties of the muscle, except for half relaxation time and EMD, indicating that FR benefits are primarily accrued through neural responses and connective tissue.
Language eng
DOI 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3182a123db
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
1106 Human Movement And Sports Science
Socio Economic Objective 920409 Injury Control
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2013, American College of Sports Medicine
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30083008

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 28 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 28 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 48 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 22 Apr 2016, 11:53:49 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.