Influence of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the lower-body power profile

Nibali, Maria L., Chapman, Dale W., Robergs, Robert A. and Drinkwater, Eric J. 2013, Influence of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the lower-body power profile, Journal of strength and conditioning research, vol. 27, no. 10, pp. 2723-2729, doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280c6fb.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Influence of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the lower-body power profile
Author(s) Nibali, Maria L.
Chapman, Dale W.
Robergs, Robert A.
Drinkwater, Eric J.ORCID iD for Drinkwater, Eric J.
Journal name Journal of strength and conditioning research
Volume number 27
Issue number 10
Start page 2723
End page 2729
Total pages 7
Publisher Lippincot Williams & Wilkins
Place of publication Philadephia, Pa.
Publication date 2013-10
ISSN 1064-8011
Keyword(s) jump squats
incremental load-power profile
maximal power production
optimal load
Summary There is a paucity of evidence-based support for the allocation of rest interval duration between incremental loads in the assessment of the load-power profile. We examined the effect of rest interval duration on muscular power production in the load-power profile and sought to determine if greater rest is required with increasing load (i.e., variable rest interval). Ten physically trained men completed 4 experimental conditions in a crossover balanced design. Participants performed jump squats across incremental loads (0-60 kg) on 4 occasions, with an allocated recovery interval of 1, 2, 3, or 4 minutes. The mean log-transformed power output at each load was used for comparison between conditions (rest intervals). Unloaded jump squats (0 kg) maximized power output at each condition. The maximal mechanical power output was 66.6 ± 6.5 W·kg (1 minute), 66.2 ± 5.2 W·kg (2 minutes), 67.1 ± 5.9 W·kg (3 minutes), and 66.2 ± 6.5 W·kg (4 minutes). Trivial or unclear differences in power output were observed between rest intervals at each incremental load. As expected, power declined per 10 kg increment in load, the magnitude of decrease was 13.9-14.5% (confidence limits [CL]: ±1.3-2.0%) and 13.4-14.6% (CL: ±2.4-3.9%) for relative peak and mean power, respectively, yet differences in power output between conditions were likely insubstantial. The prescription of rest intervals between loads that are longer than 1 minute have a likely negligible effect on muscular power production in the jump squat incremental load-power profile. Practitioners should select either a 1- to 4-minute rest interval to best accommodate the logistical constraints of their monitoring sessions.
Language eng
DOI 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280c6fb
Field of Research 1106 Human Movement And Sports Science
Socio Economic Objective 929999 Health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2013, Lippincot Williams & Wilkins
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 234 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 22 Apr 2016, 12:12:37 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact