You are not logged in.

Comparisons of the two-body abrasive wear behaviour of four different ferrous microstructures with similar hardness levels

Narayanaswamy, Balaji, Hodgson, Peter and Beladi, Hossein 2016, Comparisons of the two-body abrasive wear behaviour of four different ferrous microstructures with similar hardness levels, Wear, vol. 350-351, pp. 155-165, doi: 10.1016/j.wear.2016.01.013.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Comparisons of the two-body abrasive wear behaviour of four different ferrous microstructures with similar hardness levels
Author(s) Narayanaswamy, Balaji
Hodgson, Peter
Beladi, Hossein
Journal name Wear
Volume number 350-351
Start page 155
End page 165
Total pages 11
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2016-03-15
ISSN 0043-1648
Keyword(s) Microstructures
Abrasion resistance
Sub-surface
Surface profile
Topography
Friction curve
Science & Technology
Technology
Engineering, Mechanical
Materials Science, Multidisciplinary
Engineering
Materials Science
MECHANICAL-PROPERTIES
CARBON STEEL
METALS
RESISTANCE
STRESS
Summary The abrasive wear resistance of four distinct metallurgical steel microstructures - bainite, pearlite, martensite and tempered martensite, with similar hardness levels was investigated. A pin-on-disc tribometer was used to simulate the two-body abrasive condition (i.e. the metallic surface abrading against the silicon carbide abrasive particles) and evaluate the specific wear rate of the microstructures. Each microstructure had a unique response towards the abrasion behaviour and this was largely evident in the friction curve. However, the multi-phase microstructures (i.e. bainite and pearlite) demonstrated better abrasion resistance than the single-phase microstructures (i.e. martensite and tempered martensite). Abrasion induced microstructural changes at the deformed surfaces were studied using sub-surface and topographical techniques. The properties of these layers (i.e. surface profile measurements) determined the amount of material loss for each microstructure. These were directly linked to the single-wear track analysis that highlighted a marked difference in their mode of material removal. Ploughing and wedge formation modes were dominant in the case of bainite and pearlite microstructures, whereas the cutting mode could be attributed to the higher material loss in the single-phase microstructures. The combination of brittle and ductile phases in the multi-phase microstructure matrix could be one of the driving factors for their superior abrasion resistance.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.wear.2016.01.013
Field of Research 091207 Metals and Alloy Materials
0912 Materials Engineering
0913 Mechanical Engineering
Socio Economic Objective 970109 Expanding Knowledge in Engineering
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30083216

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Institute for Frontier Materials
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 130 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 04 May 2016, 08:53:23 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.