"It's got to be more than that". Parents and speech-language pathologists discuss training content for families with a new speech generating device.

Anderson, Kate L, Balandin, Susan and Stancliffe, Roger J 2016, "It's got to be more than that". Parents and speech-language pathologists discuss training content for families with a new speech generating device., Disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 375-384, doi: 10.3109/17483107.2014.967314.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title "It's got to be more than that". Parents and speech-language pathologists discuss training content for families with a new speech generating device.
Author(s) Anderson, Kate LORCID iD for Anderson, Kate L orcid.org/0000-0003-2747-0865
Balandin, SusanORCID iD for Balandin, Susan orcid.org/0000-0003-4765-8232
Stancliffe, Roger J
Journal name Disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology
Volume number 11
Issue number 5
Start page 375
End page 384
Total pages 10
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication London, Eng
Publication date 2016-07
ISSN 1748-3115
Keyword(s) Augmentative and alternative communication
communication partner training
parent training
speech generating device
Summary PURPOSE: Although parent-implemented interventions for children with a speech-generating device (SGD) have been well researched, little is known about parents' or speech-language pathologists' (SLPs) views around parent training content. In this project, we aimed to identify areas that parents and SLPs consider should be included in training for families with a new SGD.

METHODS: Seven parents of children with an SGD and three SLPs who were new to the SGD field, participated in individual semi-structured interviews. Ten SLPs experienced in SGD practice took part in two focus groups. Data were analysed using grounded theory methods.

RESULTS: Participants identified the following areas suitable for inclusion in a family SGD training package: (a) content aimed at improving acceptance and uptake of the SGD, including technical guidance, customisation and reassurance around SGD misconceptions; (b) content around aided language development and (c) home practice strategies, including responsivity, aided language stimulation and managing children's motivation.

CONCLUSIONS: Participants identified diverse training targets, many of which are unexplored in parent-training research to date. Their recounted experiences illustrate the diversity of family capacity, knowledge and training priorities, and highlight the need for collaborative planning between families and SLPs at all stages of SGD training. Implications for Rehabilitation Training needs for families with a new speech generating device (SGD) are diverse, ranging from technology-specific competencies to broader areas, such as advocacy, teamwork and goal-setting skills. Each family with a new SGD will have a unique profile of training needs, determined by individual learning capacity, priorities, prior knowledge and experience, as well as their child's current communication skills and future support needs. Parents and speech-language pathologists (SLPs) may hold different priorities concerning family SGD training, necessitating ongoing team discussion.
Language eng
DOI 10.3109/17483107.2014.967314
Field of Research 1117 Public Health And Health Services
111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Taylor & Francis
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30083398

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 5 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 449 Abstract Views, 4 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 11 May 2016, 14:00:00 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.