You are not logged in.

The impact of coordinated care : Eyre region, South Australia 1997-1999

Harvey, Peter 2001, The impact of coordinated care : Eyre region, South Australia 1997-1999, Australian journal of rural health, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 70-74, doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00319.x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The impact of coordinated care : Eyre region, South Australia 1997-1999
Author(s) Harvey, PeterORCID iD for Harvey, Peter orcid.org/0000-0003-2983-663X
Journal name Australian journal of rural health
Volume number 9
Issue number 2
Start page 70
End page 74
Total pages 5
Publisher Wiley-Blackwell
Place of publication Milton, Qld.
Publication date 2001-04
ISSN 1038-5282
1440-1584
Keyword(s) coordinated care
Eyre region
health service
rural
SA HealthPlus
Summary The SA HealthPlus Coordinated Care Trial in the Eyre Region began in fortuitous circumstances. First, it coincided with the completion of the Eyre Regional Health Service (ERHS) needs assessment in 1996, which highlighted outstanding health service needs and community concerns in relation to health care across the region. Second, although conceived as a formal trial, using standard research techniques, scientific processes and formal control groups to test significant differences between intervention and control groups, the trial did not conform strictly to the rules of social science or pure science and became more an exercise in action research. More significantly still, the Eyre Region became involved in the process, not so much as a way of proving a concept (the SA Health Plus hypotheses around utilisation, funding and health outcomes), but as a way of creating opportunities for change in the regional health system. If nothing else, the region stood to benefit from the implementation of the trial and involvement in the trial process. The present paper outlines the impact of the Eyre Coordinated Care Trial, not in terms of hypotheses and data analysis, but in terms of the impact of the trial processes on systems change and the evolution of an outcome-based health system. Such a system has the potential to deliver improved health outcomes to communities within existing financial resources and make much more effective use of resources by integrating care delivery and encouraging collaboration between health providers. In addition, the success of the change process in Eyre also supports the notion that change is not necessarily predicated upon scientific processes and research outcomes alone, but also upon the human and social structures associated with such endeavours. This perspective also contributes to the debate about the nature and role of science in the advancement of knowledge.
Language eng
DOI 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2001.00319.x
Field of Research 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2001, National Rural Health Alliance
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30083858

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 5 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 75 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 01 Jun 2016, 11:51:56 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.