You are not logged in.

Generalization in IS research: a critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams

Seddon, Peter B. and Scheepers, Rens 2015, Generalization in IS research: a critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams. In Willcocks, Leslie P., Sauer, Chris and Lacity, Mary C. (ed), Formulating research methods for information systems, Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, Eng., pp.179-209, doi: 10.1057/9781137509857_8.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Generalization in IS research: a critique of the conflicting positions of Lee & Baskerville and Tsang & Williams
Author(s) Seddon, Peter B.
Scheepers, Rens
Title of book Formulating research methods for information systems
Editor(s) Willcocks, Leslie P.
Sauer, Chris
Lacity, Mary C.
Publication date 2015
Series Volume 1
Chapter number 7
Total chapters 9
Start page 179
End page 209
Total pages 31
Publisher Palgrave Macmillan
Place of Publication Basingstoke, Eng.
Summary This edited two-volume collection presents the most interesting and compelling articles pertaining to the formulation of research methods used to study information systems from the 30-year publication history of the Journal of Information Technology.
ISBN 9781137509857
9781349561124
1349561126
Language eng
DOI 10.1057/9781137509857_8
Field of Research 080611 Information Systems Theory
Socio Economic Objective 899999 Information and Communication Services not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category B1 Book chapter
ERA Research output type B Book chapter
Copyright notice ©2015, Palgrave Macmillan
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30084272

Document type: Book Chapter
Collection: Department of Information Systems and Business Analytics
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 70 Abstract Views, 8 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 22 Jun 2016, 11:56:15 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.