Peer research with young Muslims and the politics of knowledge production

Vassadis, Anna, Karimshah, Ameera, Harris, Anita and Youssef, Youssef 2015, Peer research with young Muslims and the politics of knowledge production, Qualitative research journal, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 268-281, doi: 10.1108/QRJ-06-2014-0029.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Peer research with young Muslims and the politics of knowledge production
Author(s) Vassadis, Anna
Karimshah, Ameera
Harris, Anita
Youssef, Youssef
Journal name Qualitative research journal
Volume number 15
Issue number 3
Start page 268
End page 281
Total pages 14
Publisher Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Place of publication Bingley, Eng.
Publication date 2015-01-01
ISSN 1443-9883
1448-0980
Keyword(s) insider
outsider
peer research
young Muslims
youth research
Summary Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to draw on the authors’ experiences as a team made up of both “insiders” and “outsiders” in order to investigate how an insider-outsider peer research method facilitates productive forms of research into the lives of young Muslims, and to contribute to debates about ways of knowing youth. The authors aim to shift focus from a common claim that peer research methods simply improve research about youth to more deeply investigate how they enable, as well as limit, the production of particular kinds of knowledge, in this case, about Muslim youth in Australia. Design/methodology/approach – The research aimed to explore how “ordinary” young Australian Muslims engage in civic life. Yet the authors were faced with the challenge of accessing and recruiting “ordinary” youth in times of Islamophobia, wherein Muslim communities expressed serious concerns about their voices being misinterpreted, misused and misappropriated. Therefore, the authors sought to utilise an approach of outsider-designed and guided research that was then shaped and executed by insider peer researchers. It is this research design and its execution that the authors interrogate in this paper. Findings – As well as affording the authors access and the elicitation of rich, complex and high-quality data, the approach also fostered more complex stories about young Muslim identities and experiences, and enabled the authors to contest some common and homogenising representations. It also allowed opportunities for fundamental issues inherent in these kinds of qualitative research methods to be made explicit. These include the politics of performativity and issues of positionality in the peer research process. The authors suggest that the “insider” and “outsider” approach succeeded not so much because it got the authors closer to the “truth” about young Muslims’ civic lives, but because it revealed some of the mechanics of the ways stories are constructed and represented in youth research. Originality/value – The originality and value of this paper lie in its contribution to a debate about the politics of knowledge production about young people and Muslims in particular, and in its effort to move forward a discussion about how to be accountable in youth research to the various communities and to one another in insider-outsider research teams.
Language eng
DOI 10.1108/QRJ-06-2014-0029
Field of Research 130399 Specialist Studies in Education not elsewhere classified
160803 Race and Ethnic Relations
Socio Economic Objective 970116 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30084521

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Arts and Education
Alfred Deakin Research Institute
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 2 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 186 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 13 Oct 2016, 09:52:36 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.