Aid, growth, policies and fragility

McGillivray, Mark and Feeny, Simon 2015, Aid, growth, policies and fragility. In Arvin, B, Mak and Lew, Byron (ed), Handbook on the economics of foreign aid, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, Eng., pp.375-389, doi: 10.4337/9781783474592.00032.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Aid, growth, policies and fragility
Author(s) McGillivray, MarkORCID iD for McGillivray, Mark
Feeny, Simon
Title of book Handbook on the economics of foreign aid
Editor(s) Arvin, B, Mak
Lew, Byron
Publication date 2015
Chapter number 22
Total chapters 32
Start page 375
End page 389
Total pages 15
Publisher Edward Elgar
Place of Publication Cheltenham, Eng.
Keyword(s) Development studies
Development economics
Economics and finance
Development economics
Politics and public policy
International relations
Summary The impact of aid on per capita income growth has been a particularly controversial topic among researchers and policy-makers alike. Most studies agree that growth would be lower in the absence of aid. This is evident from comprehensive literature surveys of aid and growth studies, including Hansen and Tarp (2000), Morrissey (2001), McGillivray et al. (2006), Mekasha and Tarp (2011) and Clemens et al. (2012). There is no such agreement in this literature regarding what might be described as the contingencies on which the impact of aid on growth is partially dependent. Debate over this topic is intensive and a failure to reach agreement over it is arguably the principal failing of the aid–growth literature owing to the potential guidance such agreement could provide for the selection of interventions aimed at improving aid effectiveness. Debate on aid–growth contingencies commenced after publication of the pioneering econometric investigation of Burnside and Dollar (1997, 2000). Burnside and Dollar multiplicatively interacted aid with a measure of policy, and found that aid only had a positive impact on growth in developing countries with good fiscal, monetary, and trade policies. Subsequent studies have sought to test the robustness of the Burnside and Dollar result, test for the relevance of different contingencies, or both. No study has been able to replicate the Burnside and Dollar result, and as such there is widespread concern in the research community over its robustness.
ISBN 9781783474592
Language eng
DOI 10.4337/9781783474592.00032
Field of Research 140202 Economic Development and Growth
Socio Economic Objective 970114 Expanding Knowledge in Economics
HERDC Research category B1 Book chapter
ERA Research output type B Book chapter
Copyright notice ©2015, Edward Elgar
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 377 Abstract Views, 25 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 30 Jun 2016, 21:09:41 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact