You are not logged in.

Comparison of performance on process- and product-oriented assessments of fundamental motor skills across childhood

Logan, Samuel W., Barnett, Lisa M., Goodway, Jacqueline D. and Stodden, David F. 2017, Comparison of performance on process- and product-oriented assessments of fundamental motor skills across childhood, Journal of sports sciences, vol. 35, no. 7, pp. 634-641, doi: 10.1080/02640414.2016.1183803.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Comparison of performance on process- and product-oriented assessments of fundamental motor skills across childhood
Author(s) Logan, Samuel W.
Barnett, Lisa M.
Goodway, Jacqueline D.
Stodden, David F.
Journal name Journal of sports sciences
Volume number 35
Issue number 7
Start page 634
End page 641
Total pages 8
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Place of publication Abingdon, Eng.
Publication date 2017
ISSN 0264-0414
1466-447X
Keyword(s) skill development
childhood
motor
Summary Process-oriented motor competence (MC) assessments evaluate how a movement is performed. Product-oriented assessments evaluate the outcome of a movement. Determining the concurrent validity of process and product assessments is important to address the predictive utility of motor competence for health. The current study aimed to: (1) compare process and product assessments of the standing long jump, hop and throw across age groups and (2) determine the capacity of process assessments to classify levels of MC. Participants included 170 children classified into three age groups: 4–5, 7–8 and 10–11 years old. Participants’ skills were examined concurrently using three process assessments ((Test of Gross Motor Development-2nd edition [TGMD-2]), Get Skilled; Get Active, and developmental sequences) and one product measure (throw speed, jump and hop distance). Results indicate moderate to strong correlations between (1) process assessments across skills and age groups (r range = .37–70) and (2) process and product assessments across skills and age groups (r range = .26–.88). In general, sensitivity to detect advanced skill level is lowest for TGMD-2 and highest for developmental sequences for all three skills. The use of process and product assessments is suggested to comprehensively capture levels of MC in human movement.
Language eng
DOI 10.1080/02640414.2016.1183803
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
1106 Human Movement And Sports Science
1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
Socio Economic Objective 929999 Health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Informa UK
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085112

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 38 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 27 Jul 2016, 14:43:53 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.