You are not logged in.

Designer policy for carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under global change

Bryan, Brett A., Runting, Rebecca K., Capon, Tim, Perring, Michael P., Cunningham, Shaun C., Kragt, Marit E., Nolan, Martin, Law, Elizabeth A., Renwick, Anna R., Eber, Sue, Christian, Rochelle and Wilson, Kerrie A. 2016, Designer policy for carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under global change, Nature climate change, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 301-309, doi: 10.1038/nclimate2874.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Designer policy for carbon and biodiversity co-benefits under global change
Author(s) Bryan, Brett A.
Runting, Rebecca K.
Capon, Tim
Perring, Michael P.
Cunningham, Shaun C.
Kragt, Marit E.
Nolan, Martin
Law, Elizabeth A.
Renwick, Anna R.
Eber, Sue
Christian, Rochelle
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Journal name Nature climate change
Volume number 6
Issue number 3
Start page 301
End page 309
Total pages 9
Publisher Nature Publishing Group
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016
ISSN 1758-678X
1758-6798
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Physical Sciences
Environmental Sciences
Environmental Studies
Meteorology & Atmospheric Sciences
Summary Carbon payments can help mitigate both climate change and biodiversity decline through the reforestation of agricultural land. However, to achieve biodiversity co-benefits, carbon payments often require support from other policy mechanisms such as regulation, targeting, and complementary incentives. We evaluated 14 policy mechanisms for supplying carbon and biodiversity co-benefits through reforestation of carbon plantings (CP) and environmental plantings (EP) in Australia's 85.3 Mha agricultural land under global change. The reference policy - uniform payments (bidders are paid the same price) with land-use competition (both CP and EP eligible for payments), targeting carbon - achieved significant carbon sequestration but negligible biodiversity co-benefits. Land-use regulation (only EP eligible) and two additional incentives complementing the reference policy (biodiversity premium, carbon levy) increased biodiversity co-benefits, but mostly inefficiently. Discriminatory payments (bidders are paid their bid price) with land-use competition were efficient, and with multifunctional targeting of both carbon and biodiversity co-benefits increased the biodiversity co-benefits almost 100-fold. Our findings were robust to uncertainty in global outlook, and to key agricultural productivity and land-use adoption assumptions. The results suggest clear policy directions, but careful mechanism design will be key to realising these efficiencies in practice. Choices remain for society about the amount of carbon and biodiversity co-benefits desired, and the price it is prepared to pay for them.
Language eng
DOI 10.1038/nclimate2874
Field of Research 050205 Environmental Management
Socio Economic Objective 970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085140

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 9 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 47 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 11 Oct 2016, 07:55:00 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.