You are not logged in.

Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children

Lopes, V. P., Barnett, Lisa M., Saraiva, L., Gonçalves, C., Bowe, Steven J., Abbott, Gavin and Rodrigues, L. P. 2016, Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children, Child: care, health and development, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 666-674, doi: 10.1111/cch.12359.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Validity and reliability of a pictorial instrument for assessing perceived motor competence in Portuguese children
Author(s) Lopes, V. P.
Barnett, Lisa M.ORCID iD for Barnett, Lisa M. orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-625X
Saraiva, L.
Gonçalves, C.
Bowe, Steven J.ORCID iD for Bowe, Steven J. orcid.org/0000-0003-3813-842X
Abbott, Gavin
Rodrigues, L. P.
Journal name Child: care, health and development
Volume number 42
Issue number 5
Start page 666
End page 674
Total pages 9
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2016-09
ISSN 1365-2214
Keyword(s) construct validity
face validity
internal consistency
perceived fundamental motor skill competence
physical activity
Summary BACKGROUND: It is important to assess young children's perceived Fundamental Movement Skill (FMS) competence in order to examine the role of perceived FMS competence in motivation toward physical activity. Children's perceptions of motor competence may vary according to the culture/country of origin; therefore, it is also important to measure perceptions in different cultural contexts. The purpose was to assess the face validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and construct validity of the 12 FMS items in the Pictorial Scale for Perceived Movement Skill Competence for Young Children (PMSC) in a Portuguese sample.

METHODS: Two hundred one Portuguese children (girls, n = 112), 5 to 10 years of age (7.6 ± 1.4), participated. All children completed the PMSC once. Ordinal alpha assessed internal consistency. A random subsamples (n = 47) were reassessed one week later to determine test-retest reliability with Bland-Altman method. Children were asked questions after the second administration to determine face validity. Construct validity was assessed on the whole sample with a Bayesian Structural Equation Modelling (BSEM) approach. The hypothesized theoretical model used the 12 items and two hypothesized factors: object control and locomotor skills.

RESULTS: The majority of children correctly identified the skills and could understand most of the pictures. Test-retest reliability analysis was good, with an agreement ration between 0.99 and 1.02. Ordinal alpha values ranged from acceptable (object control 0.73, locomotor 0.68) to good (all FMS 0.81). The hypothesized BSEM model had an adequate fit.

CONCLUSIONS: The PMSC can be used to investigate perceptions of children's FMS competence. This instrument can also be satisfactorily used among Portuguese children.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/cch.12359
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 929999 Health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, John Wiley & Sons
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085276

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition Research
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 60 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 18 Aug 2016, 13:26:35 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.