You are not logged in.

Energetic consequences of time-activity budgets for a breeding seabird

Collins, PM, Halsey, LG, Arnould, John, Shaw, PJA, Dodd, S and Green, JA 2016, Energetic consequences of time-activity budgets for a breeding seabird, Journal of zoology, vol. 300, no. 3, pp. 153-162, doi: 10.1111/jzo.12370.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Energetic consequences of time-activity budgets for a breeding seabird
Author(s) Collins, PM
Halsey, LG
Arnould, JohnORCID iD for Arnould, John orcid.org/0000-0003-1124-9330
Shaw, PJA
Dodd, S
Green, JA
Journal name Journal of zoology
Volume number 300
Issue number 3
Start page 153
End page 162
Total pages 10
Publisher Wiley- Blackwell
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016-11
ISSN 1469-7998
1469-7998
Keyword(s) time-energy budget
energy expenditure
accelerometer
kittiwake
energy ceiling
behavioural compensation
seabird
Rissa tridactyla
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Zoology
BLACK-LEGGED KITTIWAKES
CHICK-REARING PERIOD
DOUBLY LABELED WATER
RISSA-TRIDACTYLA
FOOD AVAILABILITY
PELAGIC SEABIRD
METABOLIC-RATES
FORAGING EFFORT
EXPENDITURE
ACCELEROMETRY
Summary How animals allocate their time to different behaviours has important consequences for their overall energy budget and reflects how they function in their environment. This potentially affects their ability to successfully reproduce, thereby impacting their fitness. We used accelerometers to record time-activity budgets of 21 incubating and chick-rearing kittiwakes (Rissa tridactyla) on Puffin Island, UK. These budgets were examined on a per day and per foraging trip basis. We applied activity-specific estimates of energy expenditure to the kittiwakes' time-activity budgets in order to identify the costs of variation in their allocation of time to different behaviours. Estimates of daily energy expenditure for incubating kittiwakes averaged 494 ± 20 kJ d-1 while chick-rearing birds averaged 559 ± 11 kJ d-1. Time-activity budgets highlighted that kittiwakes did not spend a large proportion of their time flying during longer foraging trips, or during any given 24-h period. With time spent flying highlighted as the driving factor behind elevated energy budgets, this suggests behavioural compensation resulting in a possible energetic ceiling to their activities. We also identified that kittiwakes were highly variable in the proportion of time they spent either flying or on the water during foraging trips. Such variation meant that using forage trip duration alone to predict energy expenditure gave a mean error of 19% when compared to estimates incorporating the proportion of a foraging trip spent flying. We have therefore highlighted that trip duration alone is not an accurate indicator of energy expenditure.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/jzo.12370
Field of Research 060201 Behavioural Ecology
060203 Ecological Physiology
Socio Economic Objective 970106 Expanding Knowledge in the Biological Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Wiley- Blackwell
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30085545

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 15 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 10 Oct 2016, 09:41:48 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.