Interventions to improve physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity using the RE-AIM framework Craike, M., Hill, B., Gaskin, C.J. and Skouteris, H. 2016, Interventions to improve physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity using the RE-AIM framework, BJOG, vol. In Press, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14276. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Interventions to improve physical activity during pregnancy: a systematic review on issues of internal and external validity using the RE-AIM framework Author(s) Craike, M. Hill, B. orcid.org/0000-0003-4993-3963 Gaskin, C.J. Skouteris, H. Journal name BJOG Volume number In Press Start page 1 End page 11 Total pages 11 Publisher Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Place of publication Chichester, Eng. Publication date 2016-08-30 ISSN 1470-0328 1471-0528 Keyword(s) Internal/external validity RE-AIM intervention physical activity pregnancy translation Summary BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) during pregnancy has significant health benefits for the mother and her child; however, many women reduce their activity levels during pregnancy and most are not sufficiently active. Given the important health benefits of PA during pregnancy, evidence that supports research translation is vital. OBJECTIVES: To determine the extent to which physical activity interventions for pregnant women report on internal and external validity factors using the RE-AIM framework (reach, efficacy/effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance). SEARCH STRATEGY: Ten databases were searched up to 1 June 2015. Eligible published papers and unpublished/grey literature were identified using relevant search terms. SELECTION CRITERIA: Studies had to report on physical activity interventions during pregnancy, including measures of physical activity during pregnancy at baseline and at least one point post-intervention. Randomised controlled trials and quasi-experimental studies that had a comparator group were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Reporting of RE-AIM dimensions were summarised and synthesised across studies. MAIN RESULTS: The reach (72.1%) and efficacy/effectiveness (71.8%) dimensions were commonly reported; however, the implementation (28.9%) and adoption (23.2%) dimensions were less commonly reported and no studies reported on maintenance. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights the under-reporting of issues of contextual factors in studies of physical activity during pregnancy. The translation of physical activity interventions during pregnancy could be improved through reporting of representativeness of participants, clearer reporting of outcomes, more detail on the setting and staff who deliver interventions, costing of interventions and the inclusion of process evaluations and qualitative data. Language eng DOI 10.1111/1471-0528.14276 Field of Research 170106 Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified Socio Economic Objective 920401 Behaviour and Health HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal ERA Research output type C Journal article Copyright notice ©2016, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30086121 Document type: Journal Article Collection: School of Psychology Related Links Link Description Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges   Connect to Elements publication management system Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Versions Version Filter Type Wed, 14 Sep 2016, 08:12:15 EST Wed, 14 Sep 2016, 08:16:17 EST Thu, 15 Sep 2016, 05:00:25 EST Fri, 16 Sep 2016, 08:27:04 EST Wed, 09 Nov 2016, 11:51:13 EST Wed, 25 Jan 2017, 05:04:08 EST Fri, 27 Jan 2017, 08:29:01 EST Fri, 27 Jan 2017, 08:33:06 EST Fri, 27 Jan 2017, 08:33:59 EST Sat, 22 Apr 2017, 02:30:57 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 0 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 11 Abstract Views, 6 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 14 Sep 2016, 08:16:17 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.