You are not logged in.

How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study

Bearman, Margaret, Dawson, Phillip, Bennett, Sue, Hall, Matt, Molloy, Elizabeth, Boud, David and Joughin, Gordon 2016, How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study, Higher education, pp. 1-16, doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study
Author(s) Bearman, Margaret
Dawson, Phillip
Bennett, Sue
Hall, Matt
Molloy, Elizabeth
Boud, David
Joughin, Gordon
Journal name Higher education
Start page 1
End page 16
Total pages 16
Publisher Springer
Place of publication Dordrecht, The Netherlands
Publication date 2016-07-22
ISSN 0018-1560
1573-174X
Keyword(s) assessment
academic context
academic experiences
academic practice
teaching skills
Summary There are dissonances between educators’ aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed ‘on the ground’ can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.
Notes In Press
Language eng
DOI 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7
Field of Research 130202 Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Development
130103 Higher Education
1301 Education Systems
1303 Specialist Studies In Education
Socio Economic Objective 930202 Teacher and Instructor Development
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30086453

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Centre for Research in Assessment and Digital Learning (CRADLE)
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 6 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 03 Oct 2016, 14:34:31 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.