Reframing how evaluators think and act: new insights from Ernest House

Astbury, Brad 2016, Reframing how evaluators think and act: new insights from Ernest House, Evaluation, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 58-71, doi: 10.1177/1356389015623125.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Reframing how evaluators think and act: new insights from Ernest House
Author(s) Astbury, Brad
Journal name Evaluation
Volume number 22
Issue number 1
Start page 58
End page 71
Total pages 13
Publisher SAGE Publications
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016
ISSN 0090-4449
Keyword(s) Social Sciences
Social Sciences, Interdisciplinary
Social Sciences - Other Topics
bias
Ernest House
evaluation
practical wisdom
values
REALIST EVALUATION
CRITIQUE
Language eng
DOI 10.1177/1356389015623125
Field of Research 111799 Public Health and Health Services not elsewhere classified
Socio Economic Objective 920204 Evaluation of Health Outcomes
HERDC Research category C2 Other contribution to refereed journal
Copyright notice ©2016, The Author
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30088874

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Health and Social Development
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 5 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 20 Jan 2017, 15:07:14 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.