You are not logged in.

Liberalisation of the raditional rule of locus standi in the United Kingdom and Malaysia: a comparative study

Bari, M. Ershadul and Bari, M. Ehteshamul (Tanim) 2012, Liberalisation of the raditional rule of locus standi in the United Kingdom and Malaysia: a comparative study, Journal of Malaysian and comparative law, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 23-60.


Title Liberalisation of the raditional rule of locus standi in the United Kingdom and Malaysia: a comparative study
Author(s) Bari, M. Ershadul
Bari, M. Ehteshamul (Tanim)
Journal name Journal of Malaysian and comparative law
Volume number 39
Issue number 1
Start page 23
End page 60
Total pages 28
Publisher University of Malaya
Place of publication Malaysia
Publication date 2012
ISSN 0126-6322
Summary The classical and restrictive rule of locus standi, which is inherent in all legal systems, is aimed at to limit the access of the citizen to the court of law by insisting that only a person aggrieved can maintain an action seeking remedy for the violation of the public or private rights so that wasteful challenges by busybodies can be excluded and limited judical resources are not being misused. In the United Kingdom, Lord Denning MR in a series of epoch-making decisions in Balckburns cases, given mainly in the early 1970s, broadened the ambit of access to justice by evolving the concept of sufficient interest in place of aggrieved person. The liberalizing approach to the rule of locus standi was ultimately approved in 1977 in a new Order 53 of the Supreme Court Rules by stipulating a common standing test of sufficient interest in the matter to which the application for judical review relates. This neo sufficient interest test has received a more progressive interpretations by the superior courts of the United Kingdom to allow access to judical review not only to a particular applicant for himself but also to three others types of applicants claiming surrogate, associational or citizen standing from the realization that the possibility of instituting such applications challenging the illegalities of the executive or a public authority will induce the authority concerned to act with greater responsibility which will have the effect of maintaining the rule of law and furthering the cause of justice. But in the common law country of Malaysia, the liberalization issue of locus standi, set in motion in early 1980s in the cases of Lim Cho Hock, Mohamed bin Ismail and Tan Sri Haji Othman Saat, was held back by the then Supreme Court of the country in 1988 in the UEM case maintaning restrictive approach towards locus standi in public law which is in somewhat out of tune with the change taken place in this regard in other jurisdictions notably in the United Kingdom. It was not kept in mind that the liberalization of the rules of standing over the vears in various jurisdictions owes essentially to the creative and innovative interpretation of the few outstandings judges. Therefore, it has been proposed that the apex court of Malaysia should reconsider its conservative stance in an appropriate case for stretching the standing rule to enable a public spirited individual acting bonafide to institute an action for judical redress of a public wrong injury so that the executive or public authority can be kept on its toes and public laws are not violated with impunity
Language eng
Field of Research 180108 Constitutional Law
180106 Comparative Law
1801 Law
Socio Economic Objective 940499 Justice and the Law not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2012, University of Malaya
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30088990

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: Law
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 17 Abstract Views  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 16 Nov 2016, 12:46:49 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.