Australian social work academics' perceptions of their teaching roles within higher education Goldingay, Sophie, Lamaro Haintz, Greer, Ryan, Juliana, Hitch, Danielle and Macfarlane, Susie 2016, Australian social work academics' perceptions of their teaching roles within higher education, Higher education research & development, pp. 1-14, doi: 10.1080/07294360.2016.1263933. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Australian social work academics' perceptions of their teaching roles within higher education Author(s) Goldingay, Sophie orcid.org/0000-0002-0776-1086 Lamaro Haintz, Greer Ryan, Juliana Hitch, Danielle orcid.org/0000-0003-2798-2246 Macfarlane, Susie orcid.org/0000-0002-8904-8945 Journal name Higher education research & development Start page 1 End page 14 Total pages 14 Publisher Routledge Place of publication Abingdon, Eng. Publication date 2016-12-07 ISSN 0729-4360 1469-8366 Keyword(s) academic roles collegiality change ideological dilemmas social work higher education identical professional education marketisation university Summary The marketisation of higher education (HE) has created a number oftensions and ideological dilemmas that may influence howacademics see their roles and teaching practices. This paperexplores how academics in the discipline of social work (who werealso in leadership roles) perceive their roles and identities andmanage the tensions and dilemmas that arise for them as teachersin the current HE environment. Unless the tensions and dilemmasare articulated, it is not possible to understand and manage theirimpact on academics. This may lead to the loss of quality learningexperiences for students and lower workplace satisfaction. Thispaper addresses the research question: were there ideologicaldilemmas experienced by social work academics in the currentenvironment and if so, what subject positions did they adopt inresponse to these? A discursive psychology approach was used toanswer this question. Data showed a range of ideologicaldilemmas represented by each of the different subject positionsadopted. The paper concludes with questions for readers toconsider, generating ideas for transferring understanding of theseideological dilemmas into positive action within the workplace. Notes In Press Language eng DOI 10.1080/07294360.2016.1263933 Field of Research 139999 Education not elsewhere classified Socio Economic Objective 939999 Education and Training not elsewhere classified HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal ERA Research output type C Journal article Copyright notice ©2016, HERDSA Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30089459 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Health and Social Development Related Links Link Description Connect to in press version Go to link with your DU access privileges   Connect to Elements publication management system Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Versions Version Filter Type Mon, 28 Nov 2016, 14:15:22 EST Tue, 29 Nov 2016, 04:01:41 EST Tue, 29 Nov 2016, 07:05:54 EST Wed, 11 Jan 2017, 10:02:27 EST Mon, 20 Mar 2017, 05:04:46 EST Mon, 03 Apr 2017, 11:48:01 EST Mon, 03 Apr 2017, 11:52:49 EST Fri, 21 Apr 2017, 13:47:40 EST Sat, 17 Jun 2017, 02:33:28 EST Sat, 08 Jul 2017, 02:35:05 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 0 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 8 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Mon, 28 Nov 2016, 14:15:22 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.