You are not logged in.

Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies

Cassar, Samantha, Misso, Marie L., Hopkins, William G., Shaw, Christopher S., Teede, Helena J. and Stepto, Nigel K. 2016, Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies, Human reproduction, vol. 31, no. 11, pp. 2619-2631, doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew243.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Insulin resistance in polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp studies
Author(s) Cassar, Samantha
Misso, Marie L.
Hopkins, William G.
Shaw, Christopher S.ORCID iD for Shaw, Christopher S. orcid.org/0000-0003-1499-0220
Teede, Helena J.
Stepto, Nigel K.
Journal name Human reproduction
Volume number 31
Issue number 11
Start page 2619
End page 2631
Total pages 13
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2016-11
ISSN 0268-1161
1460-2350
Summary STUDY QUESTION What is the degree of intrinsic insulin resistance (IR) in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and the relative contribution of BMI to overall IR based on meta-analysis of gold standard insulin clamp studies?

SUMMARY ANSWER We report an inherent reduction (-27%) of insulin sensitivity (IS) in PCOS patients, which was independent of BMI.

WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN PCOS is prevalent, complex and underpinned by IR but controversies surround the degree of intrinsic IR in PCOS, the effect of BMI and the impact of the different diagnostic criteria (NIH versus Rotterdam) in PCOS.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION A systematic review and meta-analysis of Medline and All EBM databases was undertaken of studies published up to 30 May 2015. Studies were included if premenopausal women diagnosed with PCOS were compared with a control group for IS, measured by the gold standard euglycaemic-hyperinsulinaemic clamp. The systematic review adheres to the principles of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Meta-analyses were performed using mixed modelling and magnitude-based inferences expressed as mean effect ±99% CI. We inferred the effect was small, moderate or large relative to a smallest important change of -3.7% or 3.8% derived by standardisation. Effects were deemed unclear when the CI overlapped smallest important positive and negative values. Effects were qualified with probabilities reflecting uncertainty in the magnitude of the true value (likely, 75-95%; very likely, 95-99.5%; most likely, >99.5%).

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHOD A total of 4881 articles were returned from the search. Of these, 28 articles were included in the meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Overall IS was lower in women with PCOS compared with controls (mean effect -27%, 99% CI ±6%; large, most likely lower). A higher BMI exacerbated the reduction in IS by -15% (±8%; moderate, most likely lower) in PCOS compared with control women. There was no clear difference in IS between women diagnosed by the original National Institutes of Health (NIH) criteria alone compared with those diagnosed by the Rotterdam criteria. Low levels of sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) were associated with reduced levels of IS (-10%, ±10%; small, very likely negative), which was not confounded by BMI.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This systematic review and meta-analysis inherited the confounding problems of small sample sizes, missing data (e.g. some hormones, waist and hip girths) and the lack of Rotterdam criteria phenotype reporting, limiting the evidence synthesis and meta-analysis.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS BMI has a greater impact on IS in PCOS than in controls. SHBG appears a potentially valuable marker of IR in PCOS, whereas testosterone after adjustment for BMI demonstrated an unexpected interplay with IS which warrants further investigation.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This work was supported by grants from the National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC), grant number 606553 (H.J.T., N.K.S.), as well as Monash University. H.J.T. is an NHMRC Research Fellow. N.K.S. is supported through the Australian Government's Collaborative Research Networks (CRN) programme. The funding bodies played no role in the design, methods, data management or analysis or in the decision to publish. All authors declare no conflict of interests.

REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/humrep/dew243
Field of Research 110399 Clinical Sciences not elsewhere classified
16 Studies In Human Society
11 Medical And Health Sciences
Socio Economic Objective 920507 Women's Health
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, The Author
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30090521

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 43 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 11 Jan 2017, 10:37:09 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.