You are not logged in.

The reliability and validity of an authentic motor skill assessment tool for early adolescent girls in an Australian school setting

Lander, Natalie, Morgan, Philip J., Salmon, Jo, Logan, Samuel W. and Barnett, Lisa M. 2017, The reliability and validity of an authentic motor skill assessment tool for early adolescent girls in an Australian school setting, Journal of science and medicine in sport, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.007.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The reliability and validity of an authentic motor skill assessment tool for early adolescent girls in an Australian school setting
Author(s) Lander, Natalie
Morgan, Philip J.
Salmon, JoORCID iD for Salmon, Jo orcid.org/0000-0002-4734-6354
Logan, Samuel W.
Barnett, Lisa M.ORCID iD for Barnett, Lisa M. orcid.org/0000-0002-9731-625X
Journal name Journal of science and medicine in sport
Volume number 20
Issue number 6
Start page 1
End page 5
Total pages 5
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2017-06
ISSN 1440-2440
1878-1861
Keyword(s) Adolescents
Assessment
Movement components
Physical education
Summary OBJECTIVES: Proficiency in fundamental movement skills (FMS) is positively correlated with cardiorespiratory fitness, healthy weight status, and physical activity. Many instruments have been developed to assess FMS in children. It is important to accurately measure FMS competency in adolescent populations, particularly in girls, who are less proficient than boys. Yet these tests have not been validated or tested for reliability among girls in this age group. DESIGN: The current study tested the concurrent validity and reliability of two FMS assessment instruments; the newly developed Canadian Agility and Movement Skill Assessment (CAMSA), against the Victorian FMS Assessment from Australia, among a sample of early adolescent girls. METHODS: In total, 34 Year 7 females (mean age 12.6 years) from Australia were tested and retested on each instrument in a school setting. RESULTS: Test-retest reliability was excellent for the overall CAMSA score (ICC=0.91) and for the isolated time and skill score components (time: ICC=0.80; skill: ICC=0.85). Test-retest reliability of the Victorian FMS Assessment was also good (ICC=0.79). There was no evidence of proportional bias in either assessment. There was evidence of strong concurrent validity (rs=0.68, p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both instruments were found to be reliable and valid. However, compared to the Victorian FMS instrument, the CAMSA has the advantage of both process and product assessment, less time needed to administer and higher authenticity, and so may be an attractive alternative to the more traditional forms of FMS assessment, for use with early adolescent girls, in school settings.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.11.007
Field of Research 110699 Human Movement and Sports Science not elsewhere classified
1106 Human Movement And Sports Science
1117 Public Health And Health Services
Socio Economic Objective 920499 Public Health (excl. Specific Population Health) not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2017, Sports Medicine Australia
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30090994

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 53 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 06 Mar 2017, 09:57:46 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.