An assessment of the present state of statutory derivative proceedings

Keay, Andrew and Loughrey, Joan 2012, An assessment of the present state of statutory derivative proceedings. In Loughrey, Joan (ed), Directors' duties and shareholder litigation in the wake of the financial crisis, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, Eng., pp.187-228, doi: 10.4337/9780857939661.00013.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title An assessment of the present state of statutory derivative proceedings
Author(s) Keay, AndrewORCID iD for Keay, Andrew
Loughrey, Joan
Title of book Directors' duties and shareholder litigation in the wake of the financial crisis
Editor(s) Loughrey, Joan
Publication date 2012
Chapter number 7
Total chapters 8
Start page 187
End page 228
Total pages 42
Publisher Edward Elgar Publishing
Place of Publication Cheltenham, Eng.
Summary On 1 October 2007 a significant portion of the Companies Act 2006 (‘the Act’) became operative. Included in the provisions put into force on that day was Part 11 of the Act, which provides for a derivative proceedings regime. Part 11 was enacted in response to the recommendations of both the Law Commission1 and the Scottish Law Commission.2 The regime effectively overhauls the common law position which required a share- holder who wished to bring proceedings to enforce the rights of his or her company to establish an exception to the rule in Foss v Harbottle.3 The rule in Foss provided essentially that if a company was prejudiced in some way it, and it alone, had to bring proceedings against those who had committed the harmful action against it. The shareholders did not have standing to take action. If the wrongdoers were in control of the company, as directors or majority shareholders, usually the company would refrain from taking any legal action, for obvious reasons. Share- holders were left to instituting a derivative action on behalf of their company, and most often shareholders, in bringing such actions, would rely on the ‘fraud on the minority’ exception. This provided that if a shareholder could establish that the action harming the company constituted a fraud on the minority and the wrongdoers controlled the company, he or she would be permitted to take derivative proceedings. The proceedings derived from the rights of the company.
ISBN 9780857939654
Language eng
DOI 10.4337/9780857939661.00013
Field of Research 1801 Law
Socio Economic Objective 970118 Expanding Knowledge in Law and Legal Studies
HERDC Research category B1.1 Book chapter
ERA Research output type B Book chapter
Copyright notice ©2013, The Editor & Authors
Persistent URL

Document type: Book Chapter
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
ERA Postprints
2018 ERA Submission
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 377 Abstract Views, 23 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 13 Mar 2017, 10:30:21 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact