You are not logged in.
Openly accessible

A national training program for simulation educators and technicians: evaluation strategy and outcomes

Nestel, Debra, Bearman, Margaret, Brooks, Peter, Campher, Dylan, Freeman, Kirsty, Greenhill, Jennene, Jolly, Brian, Rogers, Leanne, Rudd, Cobie, Sprick, Cyle, Sutton, Beverley, Harlim, Jennifer and Watson, Marcus 2016, A national training program for simulation educators and technicians: evaluation strategy and outcomes, BMC medical education, vol. 16, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0548-x.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
bearman-anationaltraining-2016.pdf Published version application/pdf 625.79KB 2

Title A national training program for simulation educators and technicians: evaluation strategy and outcomes
Author(s) Nestel, Debra
Bearman, Margaret
Brooks, Peter
Campher, Dylan
Freeman, Kirsty
Greenhill, Jennene
Jolly, Brian
Rogers, Leanne
Rudd, Cobie
Sprick, Cyle
Sutton, Beverley
Harlim, Jennifer
Watson, Marcus
Journal name BMC medical education
Volume number 16
Article ID 25
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Publisher BioMed Central
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2016
ISSN 1472-6920
Keyword(s) simulation
program evaluation
health workforce
faculty development
Summary Background: Simulation-based education (SBE) has seen a dramatic uptake in health professions education over the last decade. SBE offers learning opportunities that are difficult to access by other methods. Competent faculty is seen as key to high quality SBE. In 2011, in response to a significant national healthcare issue – the need to enhance thequality and scale of SBE - a group of Australian universities was commissioned to develop a national training program - Australian Simulation Educator and Technician Training (AusSETT) Program. This paper reports the evaluation of this large-scale initiative.

Methods: The AusSETT Program adopted a train-the-trainer model, which offered up to three days of workshops and between four and eight hours of e-learning. The Program was offered across all professions in all states and territories. Three hundred and three participants attended workshops with 230 also completing e-learning modules. Topics included: foundational learning theory; orientation to diverse simulation modalities; briefing; and debriefing. A layered objectives-oriented evaluation strategy was adopted with multiple stakeholders (participants, external experts),methods of data collection (end of module evaluations, workshop observer reports and individual interviews) and at multiple data points (immediate and two months later). Descriptive statistics were used to analyse numerical data while textual data (written comments and transcripts of interviews) underwent content or thematic analysis.

Results: For each module, between 45 and 254 participants completed evaluations. The content and educational methods were rated highly with items exceeding the pre-established standard. In written evaluations, participants identified strengths (e.g. high quality facilitation, breadth and depth of content) and areas for development (e.g. electronic portfolio, learning management system) of the Program. Interviews with participants suggested the Program had positively impacted their educational practices. Observers reported a high quality educational experience for participants with alignment of content and methods with perceived participant needs.

Conclusions: The AusSETT Program is a significant and enduring learning resource. The development of a national training program to support a competent simulation workforce is feasible. The Program objectives were largely met. Although there are limitations with the study design (e.g. self-report), there are strengths such as exploring the impact two months later. The evaluation of the Program informs the next phase of the national strategy for simulation educators and technicians with respect to content and processes, strengths and areas for development.
Language eng
DOI 10.1186/s12909-016-0548-x
Field of Research 130209 Medicine, Nursing and Health Curriculum and Pedagogy
1302 Curriculum And Pedagogy
1117 Public Health And Health Services
Socio Economic Objective 930203 Teaching and Instruction Technologies
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, The Authors
Free to Read? Yes
Use Rights Creative Commons Attribution licence
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30092758

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 21 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 03 Apr 2017, 13:00:54 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.