You are not logged in.

Is demineralization with dilute hydrofluoric acid a viable method for isolating mineral stabilized soil organic matter?

Sanderman, J, Farrell, M, Macreadie, Peter, Hayes, M, McGowan, J and Baldock, J 2017, Is demineralization with dilute hydrofluoric acid a viable method for isolating mineral stabilized soil organic matter?, Geoderma, vol. 304, pp. 1-8, doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.03.002.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Is demineralization with dilute hydrofluoric acid a viable method for isolating mineral stabilized soil organic matter?
Author(s) Sanderman, J
Farrell, M
Macreadie, PeterORCID iD for Macreadie, Peter
Hayes, M
McGowan, J
Baldock, J
Journal name Geoderma
Volume number 304
Start page 1
End page 8
Total pages 8
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2017-03
ISSN 0016-7061
Keyword(s) Carbon sequestration
Dissolved organic carbon
Solid-state NMR spectroscopy
Blue carbon
Carbon stabilization
Summary Hydrofluoric acid (HF) is a powerful tool in the investigation of soil organic matter (SOM) due to its ability to dissolve minerals but not break the chemical bonds of organic matter. These properties make the use of HF a common pretreatment step for removing paramagnetic interferences and concentrating carbon prior to solid-state 13C NMR spectroscopy with the working assumption that any SOM lost during HF treatment will not bias the resulting NMR spectra. Hydrofluoric acid is also used to isolate a mineral-stabilized OM fraction with the working assumption that most mineral-stabilized OM is primarily low molecular weight compounds bound to mineral surfaces and when the minerals are dissolved in HF, the OM bound to these surfaces will be lost to solution. The working assumptions behind these two uses of HF dissolution appear to be contradictory. To address this apparent conundrum, we treated a number of simple organic compounds, soil and sediment samples with HF in 2 and 10% concentrations and tracked C and N loss as well as chemical shifts observed in solid-state 13C NMR spectra. For the soil and sediment samples there were inconsistent C and N losses but no difference in loss between the 2% and 10% HF concentrations. There were no obvious soil properties that could explain the differences in C or N loss. Overall, there were significant shifts in NMR-observable organic chemistry after treatment with both 2 and 10% HF with anoxic fine grained sediments under a seagrass meadow exhibiting strong preferential loss of O-alkyl C while terrestrial soils generally lost OM with more of a mixed chemical character. For many samples, the degree of selective loss was enough to significantly bias the interpretation of OM composition. Given the lack of ability to explain the large differences in C loss between samples with observed soil properties, this study suggests that caution should be used when interpreting HF-soluble C to indicate a mineral-stabilized fraction without considering the soil physicochemical environment and putative mechanisms for organo-mineral associations in that particular soil.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.03.002
Field of Research 050301 Carbon Sequestration Science
05 Environmental Sciences
06 Biological Sciences
07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciences
Socio Economic Objective 970105 Expanding Knowledge in the Environmental Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2017, Elsevier
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 21 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 24 May 2017, 11:32:52 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact