A comparative analysis of the doctrinal consequences of interpretive disagreement for implied constitutional rights

Robinson, Zoe 2012, A comparative analysis of the doctrinal consequences of interpretive disagreement for implied constitutional rights, Washington University Global Studies Law Review, vol. 11:93, pp. 93-150.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A comparative analysis of the doctrinal consequences of interpretive disagreement for implied constitutional rights
Author(s) Robinson, Zoe
Journal name Washington University Global Studies Law Review
Volume number 11:93
Start page 93
End page 150
Total pages 59
Publisher Washington University in St Louis
Place of publication United States
Publication date 2012
ISSN 1546-6981
Language eng
Field of Research 1801 Law
Socio Economic Objective 0 Not Applicable
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©Washington University in St Louis, 2012
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30093996

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Law
2018 ERA Submission
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 18 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 16 May 2017, 15:09:51 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.