You are not logged in.

Funder interference in addiction research: an international survey of authors

Miller, Peter, Martino, Florentine, Gross, Samantha, Curtis, Ashlee, Mayshak, Richelle, Droste, Nicolas and Kypri, Kypros 2017, Funder interference in addiction research: an international survey of authors, Addictive behaviors, vol. 72, pp. 100-105, doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.026.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Funder interference in addiction research: an international survey of authors
Author(s) Miller, PeterORCID iD for Miller, Peter orcid.org/0000-0002-6896-5437
Martino, Florentine
Gross, Samantha
Curtis, AshleeORCID iD for Curtis, Ashlee orcid.org/0000-0001-9182-2840
Mayshak, RichelleORCID iD for Mayshak, Richelle orcid.org/0000-0003-2075-9447
Droste, Nicolas
Kypri, Kypros
Journal name Addictive behaviors
Volume number 72
Start page 100
End page 105
Total pages 6
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2017-09
ISSN 0306-4603
1873-6327
Keyword(s) censorship
ethics
funder influence
research integrity
vested interests
Summary OBJECTIVE: Scientific research is essential to the development of effective addiction treatment and drug policy. Actions that compromise the integrity of addiction science need to be understood. The aim of this study is to investigate funder (e.g. industry, government or charity) interference in addiction science internationally. METHOD: Corresponding authors of all 941 papers published in an international specialist journal July 2004 to June 2009 were invited to complete a web questionnaire. A sensitivity analysis with extreme assumptions about non-respondents was undertaken. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 322 authors (response fraction 34%), 36% (n=117) of whom had encountered at least one episode (median=3, Interquartile range=4) of funder interference in their research: 56% in Australasia, 33% in Europe, and 30% in North America. Censorship of research outputs was the most common form of interference. The wording or writing of reports and articles, as well as where, when and how findings were released were the areas in which influence was most often reported. CONCLUSIONS: Funder interference in addiction science appears to be common internationally. Strategies to increase transparency in the addiction science literature, including mandatory author declarations concerning the role of the funder, are necessary.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.03.026
Field of Research 170199 Psychology not elsewhere classified
1701 Psychology
Socio Economic Objective 929999 Health not elsewhere classified
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2017, Elsevier
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30094113

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 25 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 12 Apr 2017, 10:01:55 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.