The appendix stump: should it be invaginated?

Watters, D. A. K., Walker, M. A. and Abernethy, B C. 1984, The appendix stump: should it be invaginated?, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, vol. 66, no. 2, pp. 92-93.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The appendix stump: should it be invaginated?
Author(s) Watters, D. A. K.ORCID iD for Watters, D. A. K. orcid.org/0000-0002-5742-8417
Walker, M. A.
Abernethy, B C.
Journal name Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England
Volume number 66
Issue number 2
Start page 92
End page 93
Total pages 2
Publisher Royal College of Surgeons of England
Place of publication Colchester, Eng.
Publication date 1984-03
ISSN 0035-8843
Keyword(s) Adolescent
Adult
Appendectomy
Child
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Ligation
Male
Middle Aged
Postoperative Period
Prospective Studies
Surgical Wound Infection
appendix stump
invatination
Summary In a prospective trial of 103 patients undergoing appendicectomy, one group of patients had the appendix stump treated by ligation alone and the other group underwent ligation and invagination. The two groups of patients were similar with respect to age, sex, incision and degree of inflammation of the appendix. Perforated appendices were excluded and in neither group were drains used or antibiotics given. No significant difference between the two methods of treatment of the appendix stump was noted, either with respect to wound infection or postoperative stay in hospital.
Language eng
Field of Research 1103 Clinical Sciences
HERDC Research category CN.1 Other journal article
Copyright notice ©1984, Royal College of Surgeons of England
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30100039

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 22 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 20 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 6 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 26 Jul 2017, 14:08:30 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.