Openly accessible

Better land-use allocation outperforms land sparing and land sharing approaches to conservation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia

Law, Elizabeth A., Meijaard, Erik, Bryan, Brett A., Mallawaarachchi, Thilak, Koh, Lian Pin and Wilson, Kerrie A. 2015, Better land-use allocation outperforms land sparing and land sharing approaches to conservation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia, Biological conservation, vol. 186, pp. 276-286, doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.004.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
bryan-betterlanduse-2015.pdf Published version application/pdf 1.62MB 11

Title Better land-use allocation outperforms land sparing and land sharing approaches to conservation in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia
Author(s) Law, Elizabeth A.
Meijaard, Erik
Bryan, Brett A.ORCID iD for Bryan, Brett A. orcid.org/0000-0003-4834-5641
Mallawaarachchi, Thilak
Koh, Lian Pin
Wilson, Kerrie A.
Journal name Biological conservation
Volume number 186
Start page 276
End page 286
Total pages 11
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2015-06
ISSN 0006-3207
Keyword(s) biodiversity conservation
ecosystem services
multifunctional landscapes
land use planning
scenario analysis
wildlife friendly farming
Summary Land sparing and land sharing are contrasting strategies often aimed at improving both agricultural production and biodiversity conservation in multifunctional landscapes. These strategies are embodied in land management policies at local to international scales, commonly in conjunction with other land-use policies. Evaluation of these strategies at a landscape scale, for multiple ecosystem service benefits, and multiple elements of biodiversity has not previously been attempted. We simulated the effects of applying land sharing and land sparing strategies to the agricultural zones designated by four future land-use scenarios (reflecting both current land-use and prospective land-use plans) in the Ex-Mega Rice Project region of Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. We assessed impacts of each strategy on biodiversity, agricultural production, and other ecosystem service benefits at a landscape scale. We examined whether it was possible to achieve predetermined targets that reflect the aspirations and entitlements of diverse stakeholder groups. We found that the prospective land-use plans for the region would deliver considerably more benefit than the current land-use allocations, and while not all targets can be achieved, additional progress could be made with reasonable and realistic levels of land sharing or sparing. We found that species and forest types sensitive to agricultural disturbance could benefit most if land in agricultural zones was spared and prioritised for conservation. Conversely, land sharing strategies favoured the more widespread and common species, particularly if the area of wildlife-friendly agriculture is increased. However, the effectiveness of agricultural-focused land management strategies is inherently limited by the extent of agricultural zones. While agricultural land sparing and sharing strategies can deliver some gains in target achievement for multiple ecosystem services, we find that they have a limited effect over the benefits achieved by implementing better land-use allocation from the outset.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.004
Field of Research 05 Environmental Sciences
06 Biological Sciences
07 Agricultural And Veterinary Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2015, The Authors
Free to Read? Yes
Use Rights Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No-Derivatives licence
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30102065

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 19 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 24 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 74 Abstract Views, 11 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 04 Aug 2017, 14:00:11 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.