Openly accessible

Effect of different binders on the electrochemical performance of metal oxide anode for lithium-ion batteries

Wang, Rui, Feng, Lili, Yang, Wenrong, Zhang, Yinyin, Zhang, Yanli, Bai, Wei, Liu, Bo, Zhang, Wei, Chuan, Yongming, Zheng, Ziguang and Guan, Hongjin 2017, Effect of different binders on the electrochemical performance of metal oxide anode for lithium-ion batteries, Nanoscale research letters, vol. 12, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1186/s11671-017-2348-6.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads
yang-effectofdifferent-2017.pdf Published version application/pdf 2.51MB 15

Title Effect of different binders on the electrochemical performance of metal oxide anode for lithium-ion batteries
Author(s) Wang, Rui
Feng, Lili
Yang, WenrongORCID iD for Yang, Wenrong orcid.org/0000-0001-8815-1951
Zhang, Yinyin
Zhang, Yanli
Bai, Wei
Liu, Bo
Zhang, Wei
Chuan, Yongming
Zheng, Ziguang
Guan, Hongjin
Journal name Nanoscale research letters
Volume number 12
Article ID 575
Start page 1
End page 11
Total pages 11
Publisher SpringerOpen
Place of publication Seacaucus, N.J.
Publication date 2017-10-30
ISSN 1931-7573
Keyword(s) anode material
binder
LA133
lithium-ion battery
PVDF
sodium carboxymethyl cellulose
styrene butadiene rubber
Summary When testing the electrochemical performance of metal oxide anode for lithium-ion batteries (LIBs), binder played important role on the electrochemical performance. Which binder was more suitable for preparing transition metal oxides anodes of LIBs has not been systematically researched. Herein, five different binders such as polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) HSV900, PVDF 301F, PVDF Solvay5130, the mixture of styrene butadiene rubber and sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (SBR+CMC), and polyacrylonitrile (LA133) were studied to make anode electrodes (compared to the full battery). The electrochemical tests show that using SBR+CMC and LA133 binder which use water as solution were significantly better than PVDF. The SBR+CMC binder remarkably improve the bonding capacity, cycle stability, and rate performance of battery anode, and the capacity retention was about 87% after 50th cycle relative to the second cycle. SBR+CMC binder was more suitable for making transition metal oxides anodes of LIBs.
Language eng
DOI 10.1186/s11671-017-2348-6
Field of Research 0204 Condensed Matter Physics
0912 Materials Engineering
1007 Nanotechnology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2017, The Authors
Free to Read? Yes
Use Rights Creative Commons Attribution licence
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30104034

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 45 Abstract Views, 13 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 01 Nov 2017, 20:50:05 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.