How American common law doctrines may inform Mainland China to achieve certainty in land sale contracts

Wen, Wei 2016, How American common law doctrines may inform Mainland China to achieve certainty in land sale contracts, Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 1-26.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title How American common law doctrines may inform Mainland China to achieve certainty in land sale contracts
Author(s) Wen, WeiORCID iD for Wen, Wei
Journal name Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal
Volume number 17
Issue number 1
Start page 1
End page 26
Total pages 26
Publisher University of Hawaii * William S. Richardson School of Law
Place of publication Honolulu, Haw.
Publication date 2016-04-14
ISSN 1541-244X
Keyword(s) written form
comparative law
Lon Fuller
formality functions
Karl Llewellyn
Summary This paper explores one of the most significant problems confronting Mainland China in relation to contract and property law today, which is, whether or not written form is mandatory for land sale contracts. In practice, Chinese courts have delivered contradictory cases in relation to contractual form. Some courts regard the written form as being mandatory and therefore no contractual remedies are available to enforce oral land sale contracts. In contrast, other courts hold the opposite view that oral contracts may still have some degree of contractual effect. This results in uncertainty throughout Mainland China, which may cause injustice and unfairness to claimants and may undermine the authority of the law and the courts. This paper argues that the solution to the problem is to propose a legal reform initiative to articulate that written form is mandatory for land sale contracts. This initiative will end the contradictory cases and ensure claimants are treated equally at law in this particular matter.In order to support and underpin the legal reform initiative, this paper utilizes American doctrines to enrich the Chinese literature and draws on the American experience (particularly Professor Lon Fuller's analysis) in establishing that written form is desirable for land sale contracts in Mainland China. This is through a comparative law approach known as functionalism that examines the similarities and differences of the compared jurisdictions.Furthermore, this paper has analyzed Professor Llewellyn’s empirical study as to why written form is desirable in commercial settings. This study not only reinforces the attributes of formality, but also provides Mainland China with empirical evidence of the operation of written form in the real world.Given the importance of land contracts, the legal reform initiative proposed in this paper may have social, political and economic and legal significance in a transitional China.
Language eng
Field of Research 1605 Policy And Administration
1801 Law
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2016, The Author
Persistent URL

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Business and Law
Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 97 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 13 Feb 2018, 13:50:38 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact