US smokers' beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarette variants before and after the FSPTCA ban on misleading descriptors such as 'light,' 'mild,' or 'low'

Yong, Hua-Hie, Borland, Ron, Cummings, K Michael, Lindblom, Eric N, Li, Lin, Bansal-Travers, Maansi, O'Connor, Richard J, Elton-Marshall, Tara, Thrasher, James F, Hammond, David, Thompson, Mary E and Partos, Timea R 2016, US smokers' beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarette variants before and after the FSPTCA ban on misleading descriptors such as 'light,' 'mild,' or 'low', Nicotine and tobacco research, vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 2115-2123, doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntw107.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title US smokers' beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarette variants before and after the FSPTCA ban on misleading descriptors such as 'light,' 'mild,' or 'low'
Author(s) Yong, Hua-HieORCID iD for Yong, Hua-Hie orcid.org/0000-0001-8167-6173
Borland, Ron
Cummings, K Michael
Lindblom, Eric N
Li, Lin
Bansal-Travers, Maansi
O'Connor, Richard J
Elton-Marshall, Tara
Thrasher, James F
Hammond, David
Thompson, Mary E
Partos, Timea R
Journal name Nicotine and tobacco research
Volume number 18
Issue number 11
Start page 2115
End page 2123
Total pages 9
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2016-11
ISSN 1469-994X
Keyword(s) advertising
product labelling
risk reduction behavior
smoking cessation
smoking prevention
taste perception
tobacco products
United States
smoking
color
perception
taste perception
cigarettes
Summary INTRODUCTION: In December 2008, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) took action that prompted the removal of nicotine and tar listings from cigarette packs and ads. As of June 2010, the US Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act prohibited the use of explicit or implicit descriptors on tobacco packaging or in advertising that convey messages of reduced risk or exposure, specifically including terms like "light," "mild," and "low" and similar descriptors. This study evaluates the effect of these two policy changes on smokers' beliefs, experiences and perceptions of different cigarettes. METHODS: Using generalized estimating equations models, this study analyzed survey data collected between 2002 and 2013 by the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study regarding US smokers' beliefs, experiences, and perceptions of different cigarettes. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2013, smoker misperceptions about "light" cigarettes being less harmful did not change significantly and remained substantial, especially among those who reported using lower-strength cigarettes. After the two policy changes, reported reliance on pack colors, color terms, and other product descriptors like "smooth" to determine cigarette strength style trended upward. CONCLUSIONS: Policies implemented to reduce smoker misperceptions that some cigarettes are safer than others appear to have had little impact. Because of pack colors, color terms, descriptors such as "smooth," cigarette taste or feel, and possibly other characteristics, millions of smokers continue to believe, inaccurately, that they can reduce their harms and risks by smoking one cigarette brand or sub-brand instead of another, which may be delaying or reducing smoking cessation. IMPLICATIONS: What this study adds: This study confirms that US policies to reduce smoker misperceptions that some cigarettes are less harmful than others have not been successful. Following the removal of light/low descriptors and tar and nicotine numbers from cigarette packs and ads, pack colors, color words, other descriptors (eg, smooth), and sensory experiences of smoother or lighter taste have helped smokers to continue to identify their preferred cigarette brand styles and otherwise distinguish between which brands and styles they consider "lighter" or lower in tar and, mistakenly, less harmful than others. These findings provide additional evidence to support new enforcement or regulatory action to stop cigarettes and their packaging from misleading smokers about relative risk, which may be reducing or delaying quit attempts.
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/ntr/ntw107
Field of Research 1117 Public Health And Health Services
1103 Clinical Sciences
1505 Marketing
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30108345

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 19 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 209 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 15 May 2018, 13:49:21 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.