Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training

Oliver, Penelope Sarah, Cicerale, Sara, Pang, Edwin and Keast, Russell 2018, Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training, Journal of sensory studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1111/joss.12331.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training
Author(s) Oliver, Penelope Sarah
Cicerale, SaraORCID iD for Cicerale, Sara orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-0423
Pang, Edwin
Keast, RussellORCID iD for Keast, Russell orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-7687
Journal name Journal of sensory studies
Volume number 33
Issue number 3
Article ID e12331
Start page 1
End page 11
Total pages 11
Publisher John Wiley & Sons
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2018-06
ISSN 0887-8250
1745-459X
Keyword(s) Napping
descriptive analysis
data
accuracy
Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA)
ultra‐flash profile (UFP)
science & technology
life sciences & biomedicine
food science & technology
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/joss.12331
Field of Research 0908 Food Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2018, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30110200

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 6 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 6 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 255 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 11:40:44 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.