Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training Oliver, Penelope Sarah, Cicerale, Sara, Pang, Edwin and Keast, Russell 2018, Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training, Journal of sensory studies, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1-11, doi: 10.1111/joss.12331. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Comparison of Quantitative Descriptive Analysis to the Napping methodology with and without product training Author(s) Oliver, Penelope Sarah Cicerale, Sara orcid.org/0000-0002-1100-0423 Pang, Edwin Keast, Russell orcid.org/0000-0003-2147-7687 Journal name Journal of sensory studies Volume number 33 Issue number 3 Article ID e12331 Start page 1 End page 11 Total pages 11 Publisher John Wiley & Sons Place of publication Chichester, Eng. Publication date 2018-06 ISSN 0887-8250 1745-459X Keyword(s) Napping descriptive analysis data accuracy Quantitative Descriptive Analysis (QDA) ultra‐flash profile (UFP) science & technology life sciences & biomedicine food science & technology Language eng DOI 10.1111/joss.12331 Field of Research 0908 Food Sciences HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal Copyright notice ©2018, Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30110200 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Related Links Link Description Connect to published version Go to link with your DU access privileges     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Versions Version Filter Type Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 11:40:44 EST Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 13:42:13 EST Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 13:56:35 EST Fri, 27 Jul 2018, 09:16:26 EST Tue, 31 Jul 2018, 14:36:28 EST Tue, 31 Jul 2018, 14:37:57 EST Tue, 31 Jul 2018, 14:38:37 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 7 times in TR Web of Science Cited 7 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 286 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 11:40:44 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.