Openly accessible

Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects

Chong, Luke X., McKendrick, Allison M., Ganeshrao, Shonraj B. and Turpin, Andrew 2014, Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects, Investigative ophthalmology and visual science, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 3265-3274, doi: 10.1167/iovs.13-13761.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Customized, automated stimulus location choice for assessment of visual field defects
Author(s) Chong, Luke X.ORCID iD for Chong, Luke X. orcid.org/0000-0001-5694-4500
McKendrick, Allison M.
Ganeshrao, Shonraj B.
Turpin, Andrew
Journal name Investigative ophthalmology and visual science
Volume number 55
Issue number 5
Start page 3265
End page 3274
Total pages 10
Publisher Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Place of publication Rockville, Md.
Publication date 2014-05
ISSN 0146-0404
1552-5783
Keyword(s) algorithms
computer simulation
perimetry
visual fields
Automation
Humans
Reproducibility of Results
Scotoma
Sensory Thresholds
Visual Field Tests
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Ophthalmology
FUNDUS-ORIENTED PERIMETRY
HIGH-SPATIAL-RESOLUTION
ADAPTIVE PROGRAM SAPRO
LOCALLY CONDENSED GRIDS
TEST-RETEST VARIABILITY
NERVE-FIBER LAYER
RELIABILITY INDEXES
CLINICAL PERIMETRY
THRESHOLD ESTIMATION
COMPUTER-SIMULATION
Summary PURPOSE: To introduce a perimetric algorithm (gradient-oriented automated natural neighbor approach [GOANNA]) that automatically chooses spatial test locations to improve characterization of visual field (VF) loss without increasing test times. METHODS: Computer simulations were undertaken to assess the performance of GOANNA. GOANNA was run on a 3° grid of 150 locations, and was compared with a zippy estimation by sequential testing (ZEST) thresholding strategy for locations in the 24-2 test pattern, with the remaining 98 locations being interpolated. Simulations were seeded using empirical data from 23 eyes with glaucoma that were measured at all 150 locations. The performance of the procedures was assessed by comparing the output thresholds to the input thresholds (accuracy and precision) and by evaluating the number of presentations required for the procedure to terminate (efficiency). RESULTS: When collated across whole-fields, there was no significant difference in accuracy, precision, or efficiency between GOANNA and ZEST. However, GOANNA targeted presentations on scotoma borders; hence it was more precise and accurate at locations where the sensitivity gradient within the VF was high. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with ZEST, GOANNA was marginally less precise in areas of the VF that had spatially uniform sensitivity, but improved accuracy and precision in regions surrounding scotoma edges. GOANNA provides a principled framework for automatic placement of additional test locations to provide spatially denser testing around the borders of VF loss.
Language eng
DOI 10.1167/iovs.13-13761
Field of Research 11 Medical And Health Sciences
06 Biological Sciences
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2014, The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30110268

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Open Access Collection
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 16 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 15 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 179 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Mon, 09 Jul 2018, 12:05:36 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.