Childhood obesity prevention: priority areas for future research and barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation, coproduced using the nominal group technique

Hennessy, Marita, Byrne, Molly, Laws, Rachel, Mc Sharry, Jenny, O'Malley, Grace and Heary, Caroline 2018, Childhood obesity prevention: priority areas for future research and barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation, coproduced using the nominal group technique, Translational behavioral medicine, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.1093/tbm/iby074.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Childhood obesity prevention: priority areas for future research and barriers and facilitators to knowledge translation, coproduced using the nominal group technique
Author(s) Hennessy, Marita
Byrne, Molly
Laws, RachelORCID iD for Laws, Rachel orcid.org/0000-0003-4328-1116
Mc Sharry, Jenny
O'Malley, Grace
Heary, Caroline
Journal name Translational behavioral medicine
Article ID iby074
Start page 1
End page 9
Total pages 9
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2018-07-13
ISSN 1613-9860
Keyword(s) childhood obesity
implementation science
knowledge translation
nominal group technique
prevention
research priorities
Summary Childhood obesity is a significant public health challenge, yet research priorities for childhood obesity prevention are not established. Coproduction of priorities leads to research which may be more translatable to the domains of policy and practice. The aim of the present study was to identify knowledge gaps and research priorities in addition to facilitators and barriers to knowledge translation in childhood obesity prevention. The nominal group technique involving consensus building with researchers, policymakers, and practitioners was employed during workshops at a national obesity conference held over 2 days in May 2017. Seventy-seven people participated in the first round of research prioritization on Day 1, while 14 stakeholders participated on Day 2. The top five research priorities identified were as follows: (i) Evaluate (including economic evaluation) current programs to inform practice and policy; (ii) How to change culture toward addressing the determinants of health; (iii) Implementation science: process; (iv) How to integrate obesity prevention into existing service structures; (v) How to enhance opportunities for habitual physical activity, including free play and active travel. Key themes emerging from this research prioritization exercise were the importance of funding and resources, coproduction of research, and a focus on both implementation research and social determinants within the field of childhood obesity prevention. The coproduced research priorities may help to shape the research agendas of funders and researchers, and aid in the conduct of policy-relevant research and the translation of research into practice in childhood obesity prevention.
Notes In press
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/tbm/iby074
Copyright notice ©2018, Society of Behavioral Medicine
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30111644

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 4 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 27 Jul 2018, 12:38:05 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.