Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes

Hansen, Nicole A., Sato, Chloe F., Michael, Damian R., Lindenmayer, David B. and Driscoll, Don A. 2018, Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes, Journal of applied ecology, doi: 10.1111/1365-2664.13269.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Predation risk for reptiles is highest at remnant edges in agricultural landscapes
Author(s) Hansen, Nicole A.
Sato, Chloe F.
Michael, Damian R.
Lindenmayer, David B.
Driscoll, Don A.ORCID iD for Driscoll, Don A. orcid.org/0000-0002-1560-5235
Journal name Journal of applied ecology
Total pages 13
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2018-07
ISSN 0021-8901
1365-2664
Summary © 2018 The Authors. Journal of Applied Ecology © 2018 British Ecological Society Preventing biodiversity loss in fragmented agricultural landscapes is a global problem. The persistence of biodiversity within remnant vegetation can be influenced by an animal's ability to move through the farmland matrix between habitat patches. Yet, many of the mechanisms driving species occurrence within these landscapes are poorly understood, particularly for reptiles. We used scented and unscented plasticine lizard models and wildlife cameras to (a) estimate predation risk of reptiles in four farmland types (crop field, pasture paddock, restoration tree planting and areas with applied woody mulch) relative to the patch edge and remnant vegetation, and (b) examine how predation risk was influenced by temporal change in the matrix (crop harvesting). Birds (55.1%), mammals (41.1%), reptiles (3.4%), and invertebrates (0.5%) attacked models, of which 87% were native species. Mammalian predators were 60.2% more likely to attack scented models then unscented models. Bird predators were not influenced by scent. We found predator attacks on models were highest at edges (49%, irrespective of adjacent farmland type, with a reduced risk within farmland (29%) and remnant patches (33%) (p < 0.01). Both mammal and bird predators contributed to high numbers of predation attempts at edges. Removal of crops did not increase predation attempts in crop fields or other farmland types, although predation attempts were significantly lower along the crop transect after harvesting, compared to the woody debris transect. However, numbers of predation attempts were higher in edge habitats, particularly prior to harvesting. Synthesis and applications. Reptiles are at risk of predation by birds and mammals in both remnant patches and the farmland matrix, particularly in edge habitat. Our results demonstrate that edge habitats are potentially riskier for lizards than the farmland. Vulnerability to predation may be increased by a lack of shelter within edge habitats such as by increasing visibility of reptiles to predators. Therefore, to benefit reptiles, land managers could provide shelter (rocks, logs, and grasses), particularly between remnants and linear plantings which could improve landscape connectivity.
Notes In Press
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/1365-2664.13269
Field of Research 0501 Ecological Applications
0502 Environmental Science And Management
0602 Ecology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2018, The Authors, British Ecological Society
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30114662

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 17 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 26 Oct 2018, 14:02:50 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.