The site of memory: reading surveillance, alterity, and South Australia's Indigenous archives in Natalie Harkin

Hall, Matthew 2018, The site of memory: reading surveillance, alterity, and South Australia's Indigenous archives in Natalie Harkin, Contemporary women's writing, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 67-82, doi: 10.1093/cww/vpx039.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The site of memory: reading surveillance, alterity, and South Australia's Indigenous archives in Natalie Harkin
Author(s) Hall, Matthew
Journal name Contemporary women's writing
Volume number 12
Issue number 1
Start page 67
End page 82
Total pages 16
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2018-03
ISSN 1754-1476
1754-1484
Keyword(s) Australian indigeneity
Natalie Harkin
Australian Indigenous poetry
Arts & Humanities
Literature
Summary Natalie Harkin is a Narungga artist and writer from South Australia, whose recent collection Dirty Words (Cordite Books, 2015) draws Australian Indigenous poetry toward conceptual and procedural methodologies. The archive Harkin utilizes in her conceptual writing stems from The Aboriginal Archive held in South Australian government control. It contains documents that detail the surveillance conducted upon her extended family and specif ically those surveillance records that document the life of her grandmother, collected between 1938 and 1947. This essay examines the claims to sovereign expression in Harkin's poetic, a poetic that seeks manifestly to contest the historical record through a critique of the colonial archive as a site of persuasion. This essay considers Harkin's methodologies as reconstituting and resanguinating the subjective expression, emotion, and voice of those silenced by the dominance of the colonial past. The critique of the archive that Harkin provides frames it a racialized historical construction through which systems of surveillance, control, and dominance were enacted. The constitutive genealogies and systems of power that were used to segregate and to control the conditions of Indigenous life in Australia are contextualized historically and criticized for contributing to the monohistoricizing impulses of colonial empires and using the archive to control the historical narrative and the very def inition of Australian indigeneity.
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/cww/vpx039
Indigenous content on
Field of Research 2005 Literary Studies
HERDC Research category C3 Non-refereed articles in a professional journal
Copyright notice ©2018, The Author(s)
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30116694

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Arts and Education
School of Communication and Creative Arts
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 21 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 16 Jan 2019, 14:02:08 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.