Comparing complex perspectives on obesity drivers: action-driven communities and evidence-oriented experts

McGlashan, Jaimie, Hayward, Joshua, Brown, Andrew, Owen, Brynle, Millar, L, Johnstone, Michael, Creighton, Douglas and Allender, Steven 2018, Comparing complex perspectives on obesity drivers: action-driven communities and evidence-oriented experts, Obesity science and practice, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 575-581, doi: 10.1002/osp4.306.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Comparing complex perspectives on obesity drivers: action-driven communities and evidence-oriented experts
Author(s) McGlashan, JaimieORCID iD for McGlashan, Jaimie orcid.org/0000-0003-4543-7161
Hayward, JoshuaORCID iD for Hayward, Joshua orcid.org/0000-0001-8484-9930
Brown, AndrewORCID iD for Brown, Andrew orcid.org/0000-0002-6385-3225
Owen, Brynle
Millar, L
Johnstone, MichaelORCID iD for Johnstone, Michael orcid.org/0000-0002-3005-8911
Creighton, DouglasORCID iD for Creighton, Douglas orcid.org/0000-0002-9217-1231
Allender, StevenORCID iD for Allender, Steven orcid.org/0000-0002-4842-3294
Journal name Obesity science and practice
Volume number 4
Issue number 6
Start page 575
End page 581
Total pages 7
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2018-12
ISSN 2055-2238
Keyword(s) Community health
complexity
network analysis
obesity prevention
systems science
Summary Introduction: The Foresight obesity map represents an expert-developed systems map describing the complex drivers of obesity. Recently, community-led causal loop diagrams have been developed to support community-based obesity prevention interventions. This paper presents a quantitative comparison between the Foresight obesity systems map and a community-developed map of the drivers of obesity. Methods: Variables from a community-developed map were coded against the thematic clusters defined in the Foresight map to allow comparison of their sizes and strength of adjoining causal relationships. Central variables were identified using techniques from network analysis. These properties were compared to understand the similarities and differences between the systems as defined by the two groups. Results: The community map focused on environmental influences, such as built physical activity environment (18% of variables) and social psychology (38%). The Foresight map's largest cluster was physiology (23%), a minimal focus in the community map (2%). Network analysis highlighted media and available time within both maps, but variables related to school and sporting club environments were unique to the community map. Conclusion: Community stakeholders focus on modifiable social and environmental drivers of obesity. Capturing local perspectives is critical when using systems maps to guide community-based obesity prevention.
Language eng
DOI 10.1002/osp4.306
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2018, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30116889

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 91 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 23 Jan 2019, 15:11:12 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.