Applying Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis to Australian gambling industry submissions against regulation of television sports betting advertising

Hancock, Linda, Ralph, Natalie and Martino, Florentine Petronella 2018, Applying Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis to Australian gambling industry submissions against regulation of television sports betting advertising, PLoS one, vol. 13, no. 10, pp. 1-21, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205654.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Applying Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis to Australian gambling industry submissions against regulation of television sports betting advertising
Author(s) Hancock, LindaORCID iD for Hancock, Linda orcid.org/0000-0003-2953-2353
Ralph, NatalieORCID iD for Ralph, Natalie orcid.org/0000-0001-8733-0739
Martino, Florentine PetronellaORCID iD for Martino, Florentine Petronella orcid.org/0000-0001-6718-5239
Journal name PLoS one
Volume number 13
Issue number 10
Article ID e0205654
Start page 1
End page 21
Total pages 21
Publisher Public Library of Science
Place of publication San Francisco, Calif.
Publication date 2018-10-16
ISSN 1932-6203
Keyword(s) gambling
advertising
sports
gambling addiction
regulations
public policy
finance
Australia
Science & Technology
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Summary AIMS: This research aimed to assess the application to the gambling industry, of Corporate Political Activity (CPA) analysis previously developed from public health research on tobacco industry interactions with political institutions and previously applied to the alcohol industry, but not the gambling industry. BACKGROUND: A growing body of literature has confirmed how public interest outcomes are frequently opposed by vested interests. This research focused on gambling industry submissions to a 2013 Australian Parliamentary inquiry into sports betting advertising. Gambling advertising became highly controversial following deregulation of sports betting advertising in Australia subsequent to the 2008 Australian High Court Betfair challenge. The dramatic increase in gambling advertising during sporting event broadcasts at children's viewing times and on new interactive technology, sparked public concerns. A series of national regulatory reviews followed and the gambling industry was actively involved in opposing further regulation. METHOD: The research used a corporate political activity (CPA) framework of analysis developed by UK tobacco public health researchers, which identified strategies and tactics used internationally by the tobacco industry, to broker pro-tobacco public policy outcomes. Testing the application of this CPA framework to gambling pro-industry strategies/tactics, this research focused on gambling industry submissions to the 2013 Australian Parliamentary Committee Inquiry. RESULTS: Like the tobacco industry, the research found the gambling industry used identified strategies and tactics, some new tactics and a new strategy of 'Corporate Social Responsibility', promoting 'responsible' industry practices and pre-emptive establishment of internal 'responsibility' units/practices. Despite public concerns regarding sports betting advertising, the gambling industry reinforced individual choice/blame for harms and claimed it acted responsibly. It did this using strategies identified in the tobacco industry CPA framework: information strategy (and shaping the evidence base); financial incentive strategy; constituency building strategy; policy substitution strategy; legal strategy; and constituency fragmentation and destabilization strategy. CONCLUSION: Similar to the CPA analysis applied to tobacco and alcohol industries, the research demonstrated the usefulness of the CPA taxonomy for analyzing and documenting pre-emptive industry policy strategies and tactics, exposing gambling industry efforts to maintain industry self-regulation via voluntary codes and avoid more government regulation. Cross-sectoral application of the framework signals great potential for use of CPA by policymakers and public health advocates as a tool in the analysis of corporate industry arguments/discourses.
Language eng
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0205654
Field of Research MD Multidisciplinary
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2018, Hancock et al.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30118094

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Open Access Checking
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 1 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 12 Feb 2019, 11:17:22 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.