Little to fear: largest lizard predator induces weak defense responses in ungulate prey

Jessop, Timothy S, Ariefiandy, Achmad, Purwandana, Deni, Benu, Yunias Jackson, Hyatt, Matthew and Letnic, Mike 2019, Little to fear: largest lizard predator induces weak defense responses in ungulate prey, Behavioral ecology, pp. 1-13, doi: 10.1093/beheco/ary200.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Little to fear: largest lizard predator induces weak defense responses in ungulate prey
Author(s) Jessop, Timothy SORCID iD for Jessop, Timothy S orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-4373
Ariefiandy, Achmad
Purwandana, Deni
Benu, Yunias Jackson
Hyatt, Matthew
Letnic, Mike
Journal name Behavioral ecology
Start page 1
End page 13
Total pages 13
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2019-01-18
ISSN 1045-2249
Keyword(s) apex predator
Varanus
predator–prey interactions
nonconsumptive effects
Summary Nonconsumptive effects can strongly influence apex predator ecological function. These effects arise because prey often induce costly phenotypic responses to mitigate predation risk. Yet because predator–prey interactions are complex, prey defenses may vary considerably. We investigated if the Komodo dragon (Varanus komodoensis), a reptile apex predator, induced multiscale antipredator responses in key prey, the Rusa deer (Cervus timorensis) and the wild pig (Sus scrofa). To this end, we examined the temporal and spatial partitioning of habitats by predator and prey, determined the size of ungulate groups as a function of risk, and assessed changes in individual behavior of prey individuals exposed to predator kairomones at feeding stations. Komodo dragon, deer, and pig populations exhibited significant, but subtle differences in 3 habitat preferences that otherwise indicated high niche overlap. Komodo dragon predation risk, alongside other commonly considered predictor variables, did not affect deer or pig group size. With the exception of one individual-based vigilance-type behavior in pigs, no other antipredator behavior, including reduced food consumption, significantly varied in the presence of predator odor cue at feeding stations. Overall, our results indicated limited evidence for antipredator behavior and suggested Komodo dragons exert weak nonconsumptive effects of predation in ungulates. However, weak predatory interactions could be beneficial in island ecosystems as it could promote predator–prey coexistence that reduces extinction risk.
Notes In press
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/beheco/ary200
Field of Research 0602 Ecology
0603 Evolutionary Biology
0608 Zoology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
ERA Research output type C Journal article
Copyright notice ©2019, The Author(s)
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30119242

Document type: Journal Article
Collection: School of Life and Environmental Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 9 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Sun, 03 Mar 2019, 09:51:16 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.