A systematic review to assess the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties for caries risk assessment tools for young children

Christian, Bradley, Armstrong, Rebecca, Calache, Hanny, Carpenter, Lauren, Gibbs, Lisa and Gussy, Mark 2019, A systematic review to assess the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties for caries risk assessment tools for young children, International journal of paediatric dentistry, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 106-116, doi: 10.1111/ipd.12446.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title A systematic review to assess the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties for caries risk assessment tools for young children
Author(s) Christian, Bradley
Armstrong, Rebecca
Calache, Hanny
Carpenter, Lauren
Gibbs, Lisa
Gussy, Mark
Journal name International journal of paediatric dentistry
Volume number 29
Issue number 2
Start page 106
End page 116
Total pages 11
Publisher Wiley
Place of publication Chichester, Eng.
Publication date 2019-03
ISSN 1365-263X
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Dentistry, Oral Surgery & Medicine
Pediatrics
ASSESSMENT MODEL
ORAL-HEALTH
PREDICTION
VALIDATION
CARIOGRAM
PROGRAM
Summary BACKGROUND: At present, there are numerous caries risk assessment tools (CRATs) being promoted for disease management. However, the evidence to inform CRAT selection is unclear. AIM: This review aimed to assess the strength of evidence to inform the selection of CRATs for children ages 6 years and less. DESIGN: MEDLINE was the principal search database for this review. Other key databases, the reference lists of included articles, known cariology literature and experts were also consulted. Peer-reviewed papers describing CRATs and their development methodology were included. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) checklist guided the quality assessment. The reporting of the key measurement properties (reliability, validity and responsiveness) informed the quality assessment. RESULTS: The search resulted in ten papers, reporting on eight different CRATs. The identified CRATs were: Caries Management By Risk Assessment (CAMBRA), Cariogram, National University of Singapore CRAT (NUS-CRAT), MySmileBuddy, Dundee Caries Risk Assessment Model, University of North Carolina Risk Assessment Models, University of Michigan pediatric dental clinic caries risk assessment sheet and American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD) CRAT. Common across all CRATs was the lack of information to determine the levels of evidence for the measurement properties of reliability and construct validity. Studies on tools that were assessed as having strong evidence for content validity, identified the relevant risk factors for caries in the population being studied, before developing and testing their respective CRATs. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence to inform the selection of current CRATs for children is mostly yet to be established. Overall, the NUS-CRAT studies reported the most information to inform the assessment of its measurement properties and as a result this tool attained a higher quality rating than other CRATs studied. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Language eng
DOI 10.1111/ipd.12446
Field of Research 1105 Dentistry
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2018, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30121382

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 1 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 43 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 07 May 2019, 15:36:48 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.