Structural brain development: a review of methodological approaches and best practices

Vijayakumar, Nandita, Mills, Kathryn L., Alexander-Bloch, Aaron, Tamnes, Christian K. and Whittle, Sarah 2018, Structural brain development: a review of methodological approaches and best practices, Developmental cognitive neuroscience, vol. 33, pp. 129-148, doi: 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.008.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Structural brain development: a review of methodological approaches and best practices
Author(s) Vijayakumar, NanditaORCID iD for Vijayakumar, Nandita orcid.org/0000-0002-5622-9547
Mills, Kathryn L.
Alexander-Bloch, Aaron
Tamnes, Christian K.
Whittle, Sarah
Journal name Developmental cognitive neuroscience
Volume number 33
Start page 129
End page 148
Total pages 20
Publisher Elsevier
Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Publication date 2018-10
ISSN 1878-9293
1878-9307
Keyword(s) Social Sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Psychology, Developmental
Neurosciences
Psychology
Neurosciences & Neurology
Structural MRI
Brain development
Longitudinal analyses
Methodology
CORTICAL THICKNESS MATURATION
HIGH-RESOLUTION MRI
CEREBRAL-CORTEX
SEX-DIFFERENCES
SURFACE-AREA
LONGITUDINAL CHANGES
PUBERTAL DEVELOPMENT
SUBCORTICAL ANATOMY
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
MOTION ARTIFACT
Summary © 2017 The Authors Continued advances in neuroimaging technologies and statistical modelling capabilities have improved our knowledge of structural brain development in children and adolescents. While this has provided an increasingly nuanced understanding of brain development, the field is still plagued by inconsistent findings. This review highlights the methodological diversity in existing longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies on structural brain development during childhood and adolescence, and addresses how such variation might contribute to inconsistencies in the literature. We discuss the impact of method choices at multiple decision points across the research process, from study design and sample selection, to image processing and statistical analysis. We also highlight the extent to which different methodological considerations have been empirically examined, drawing attention to specific areas that would benefit from future investigation. Where appropriate, we recommend certain best practices that would be beneficial for the field to adopt, including greater completeness and transparency in reporting methods, in order to ultimately develop an accurate and detailed understanding of normative child and adolescent brain development.
Language eng
DOI 10.1016/j.dcn.2017.11.008
Indigenous content off
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2017, The Authors
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30123612

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Psychology
Open Access Checking
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 7 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 11 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 14 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Thu, 27 Jun 2019, 14:05:49 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.