Australian university students' coping strategies and use of pharmaceutical stimulants as cognitive enhancers

Jensen, Charmaine, Forlini, Cynthia, Partridge, Brad and Hall, Wayne 2016, Australian university students' coping strategies and use of pharmaceutical stimulants as cognitive enhancers, Frontiers in psychology, vol. 7, pp. 1-9, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00277.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Australian university students' coping strategies and use of pharmaceutical stimulants as cognitive enhancers
Author(s) Jensen, Charmaine
Forlini, CynthiaORCID iD for Forlini, Cynthia orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-8229
Partridge, Brad
Hall, Wayne
Journal name Frontiers in psychology
Volume number 7
Article ID 277
Start page 1
End page 9
Total pages 9
Publisher Frontiers Media
Place of publication Lausanne, Switzerland
Publication date 2016-03
ISSN 1664-1078
Keyword(s) Social Sciences
Psychology, Multidisciplinary
Psychology
Prescription stimulants
Cognitive enhancement
Stress
Coping
University students
Summary Background: There are reports that some university students are using prescription stimulants for non-medical ‘pharmaceutical cognitive enhancement (PCE)’ to improve alertness, focus, memory, and mood in an attempt to manage the demands of study at university. Purported demand for PCEs in academic contexts have been based on incomplete understandings of student motivations, and often based on untested assumptions about the context within which stimulants are used. They may represent attempts to cope with biopsychosocial stressors in university life by offsetting students’ inadequate coping responses, which in turn may affect their cognitive performance. This study aimed to identify (a) what strategies students adopted to cope with the stress of university life and, (b) to assess whether students who have used stimulants for PCE exhibit particular stress or coping patterns.Methods: We interviewed 38 university students (with and without PCE experience) about their experience of managing student life, specifically their: educational values; study habits; achievement; stress management; getting assistance; competing activities and demands; health habits; and cognitive enhancement practices. All interview transcripts were coded into themes and analyzed.Results: Our thematic analysis revealed that, generally, self-rated coping ability decreased as students’ self-rated stress level increased. Students used emotion- and problem-focused coping for the most part and adjustment-focused coping to a lesser extent. Avoidance, an emotion-focused coping strategy, was the most common, followed by problem-focused coping strategies, the use of cognition on enhancing substances, and planning and monitoring of workload. PCE users predominantly used avoidant emotion-focused coping strategies until they no longer mitigated the distress of approaching deadlines resulting in the use of prescription stimulants as a substance-based problem-focused coping strategy.Conclusion: Our study suggests that students who choose coping responses that do not moderate stress where possible, may cause themselves additional distress and avoid learning more effective coping responses. Helping students to understand stress and coping, and develop realistic stress appraisal techniques, may assist students in general to maintain manageable distress levels and functioning. Furthermore, assisting students who may be inclined to use prescription stimulants for cognitive enhancement may reduce possible drug-related harms.
Language eng
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00277
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 1701 Psychology
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2016, Jensen, Forlini, Partridge and Hall
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30125028

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 13 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 56 Abstract Views, 3 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 09 Jul 2019, 14:26:01 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.