Generating genius: how an Alzheimer's drug became considered a 'cognitive enhancer' for healthy individuals

Wade, Lucie, Forlini, Cynthia and Racine, Eric 2014, Generating genius: how an Alzheimer's drug became considered a 'cognitive enhancer' for healthy individuals, BMC medical ethics, vol. 15, pp. 1-14, doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-15-37.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Generating genius: how an Alzheimer's drug became considered a 'cognitive enhancer' for healthy individuals
Author(s) Wade, Lucie
Forlini, CynthiaORCID iD for Forlini, Cynthia orcid.org/0000-0003-3809-8229
Racine, Eric
Journal name BMC medical ethics
Volume number 15
Article ID 37
Start page 1
End page 14
Total pages 14
Publisher BioMed Central
Place of publication London, Eng.
Publication date 2014-05-12
ISSN 1472-6939
Keyword(s) Donepezil
Alzheimer’s disease
cognitive enhancement (CE)
cognitive ability
Social Sciences
Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Ethics
Medical Ethics
Social Sciences, Biomedical
Biomedical Social Sciences
Summary Background: Donepezil, an acetylcholinesterase inhibitor used in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, has been widely cited in media and bioethics literature on cognitive enhancement (CE) as having the potential to improve the cognitive ability of healthy individuals. In both literatures, this claim has been repeatedly supported by the results of a small study published by Yesavage et al. in 2002 on non-demented pilots (30-70 years old). The factors contributing to this specific interpretation of this study's results are unclear. Methods. We examined print media and interdisciplinary bioethics coverage of this small study, aiming to provide insight into how evidence from research may be shaped within different discourses, potentially influencing important policy, ethics, and clinical decisions. Systematic qualitative content analysis was used to examine how this study was reported in 27 media and 22 bioethics articles. Articles were analyzed for content related to: (1) headlines and titles; (2) colloquialisms; and, (3) accuracy of reporting of the characteristics and results of the study. Results: In media and bioethics articles referencing this small study, strong claims were made about donepezil as a CE drug. The majority of headlines, titles, and colloquialisms used enhancement language and the majority of these suggest that donepezil could be used to enhance intellectual ability. Further, both literatures moved between reporting the results of the primary study and magnifying the perceived connection between these results and the CE debate that was alluded to in the primary study. Specific descriptions of the results overwhelmingly reported an improvement in performance on a flight simulator, while more general statements claimed donepezil enhanced cognitive performance. Further, a high level of reporting accuracy was found regarding study characteristics of the original study, but variable levels of accuracy surrounded the presentation of complex characteristics (i.e., methods) or contentious properties of the CE debate (i.e., initial health status of the study subjects). Conclusions: Hyped claims of CE effects cannot be completely accounted for by sheer inaccuracy in reporting. A complex interaction between the primary and secondary literature, and expectations and social pressures related to CE appears to drive enthusiastic reports.
Language eng
DOI 10.1186/1472-6939-15-37
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 2201 Applied Ethics
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Copyright notice ©2014, Wade et al.
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30125043

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Medicine
Open Access Checking
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 8 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 8 Abstract Views, 2 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Tue, 09 Jul 2019, 14:30:50 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.