The Public Life of Contemporary Australian Poetry

Mccooey, David 2018, The Public Life of Contemporary Australian PoetryOxford Research Encyclopedias - LITERATURE, Oxford University Press, New York, N.Y., doi: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.296.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title The Public Life of Contemporary Australian Poetry
Author(s) Mccooey, DavidORCID iD for Mccooey, David
Title of book Oxford Research Encyclopedias - LITERATURE
Publication date 2018
Total pages 28
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of Publication New York, N.Y.
Keyword(s) poetry
public culture
Australian literature
Les Murray
Aboriginal poetry
Summary Since the late 1990s, complaints about the status of poetry, and the parlous state of poetry publishing, have been commonplace in Australia and other Anglophone nations. Concomitant with this discourse of decline (a transnational discourse with a surprisingly long history) is a discourse of return, in which poetry is presented as returning to public culture (often through the literalized voice of the poet) to reoccupy the place it putatively held in earlier, if not premodern, times. Poetry’s engagement with public themes and the public use of poetry continue to be important, if sometimes overlooked, elements of Australian literary culture. Indeed, despite its apparent marginality, contemporary poetry could be said to have what may be called an “ambiguous vitality” in public life. While other forms of media continue to dominate public culture, poetry nevertheless remains public, in part by occupying or being occupied by those other forms of media. In other words, contemporary poetry’s ambiguously vital presence in public culture can be seen in the ways it figures in extra-poetic contexts. Such contexts are manifold. For instance, poetry—and the figure of the poet—are mobilized as tropes in other media such as films and novels; poetry is used as a form of public/political speech to articulate crisis and loss (such as at annual Anzac ceremonies); and it is used in everyday rituals such as weddings and funerals. Public culture, as this list suggests, is haunted by the marginal discourse of poetry.

In addition, poetry’s traditional function of commenting on the body politic and current political debates continues, regardless of the size of the medium’s putative audience. Recent poetry on the so-called “War on Terror,” the Stolen Generation, and asylum seekers illustrates this. But contemporary Australian poetry engages in public life in ways other than the thematization of current public events. Poets such as Jennifer Maiden, John Forbes, and J. S. Harry exemplify a group of poets who have figured themselves as public poets in a self-consciously ironic fashion; acknowledging poetry’s marginality, they nevertheless write poetry as if it had or may have an extra-poetic efficacy.

Language eng
DOI 10.1093/acrefore/9780190201098.013.296
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 200502 Australian Literature (excl Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Literature)
200501 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Literature
Socio Economic Objective 970119 Expanding Knowledge through Studies of the Creative Arts and Writing
HERDC Research category B1 Book chapter
Copyright notice ©2020, Oxford University Press USA
Persistent URL

Connect to link resolver
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 70 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 05 Jun 2020, 11:53:36 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact