Comparison of methodological quality between the 2007 and 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines

Dai, Zhaoli, Kroeger, Cynthia M, Lawrence, Mark, Scrinis, Gyorgy and Bero, Lisa 2020, Comparison of methodological quality between the 2007 and 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines, Public health nutrition, vol. 23, no. 16, pp. 2879-2885, doi: 10.1017/S1368980020000956.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Comparison of methodological quality between the 2007 and 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines
Author(s) Dai, Zhaoli
Kroeger, Cynthia M
Lawrence, MarkORCID iD for Lawrence, Mark orcid.org/0000-0001-6899-3983
Scrinis, Gyorgy
Bero, Lisa
Journal name Public health nutrition
Volume number 23
Issue number 16
Start page 2879
End page 2885
Total pages 7
Publisher Cambridge University Press
Place of publication Cambridge, Eng.
Publication date 2020-11
ISSN 1368-9800
1475-2727
Keyword(s) Science & Technology
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Public, Environmental & Occupational Health
Nutrition & Dietetics
Food-based dietary guidelines
Dietary recommendations
Guideline development methods
WHO standards
Summary Abstract Objective: With significant shifts in the dietary recommendations between the 2007 and 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines, such as promoting plant-based food intake, reducing highly processed food intake and advocating the practice of food skills, we compared their differences in guideline development methods. Design: Two reviewers used twenty-five guided criteria to appraise the methods used to develop the most recent dietary guidelines against those outlined in the 2014 WHO Handbook for Guideline Development. Setting: Canada. Participants: 2007 and 2019 dietary guidelines. Results: We found that the 2019 guidelines were more evidence-based and met 80 % (20/25) of the WHO criteria. For example, systematic reviews and health organisation authoritative reports, but not industry reports, constituted the evidence base for the dietary recommendations. However, recommendations on food sustainability and food skill practice were driven primarily by stakeholders’ interests. By contrast, less information was recorded about the process used to develop the 2007 guidelines, resulting in 24 % (6/25) consistency with the WHO standards. Conclusions: Our analysis suggests that a more transparent and evidence-based approach is used to develop the 2019 Canadian dietary guidelines and that method criteria should support further incorporation of nutrition priorities (food sustainability and food skills) in future dietary guideline development.
Language eng
DOI 10.1017/S1368980020000956
Indigenous content off
Field of Research 11 Medical and Health Sciences
HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30139651

Document type: Journal Article
Collections: Faculty of Health
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences
Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 1 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 0 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 29 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Fri, 03 Jul 2020, 14:20:45 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.