Openly accessible

Assessing marine biosecurity risks when data are limited: Bioregion pathway and species-based exposure analyses

Azmi, Fauziah, Primo, Carmen, Hewitt, Chad L. and Campbell, Marnie L. 2015, Assessing marine biosecurity risks when data are limited: Bioregion pathway and species-based exposure analyses, ICES Journal of Marine Science, vol. 72, no. 3, March/April, pp. 1078-1091, doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu236.

Attached Files
Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads

Title Assessing marine biosecurity risks when data are limited: Bioregion pathway and species-based exposure analyses
Author(s) Azmi, Fauziah
Primo, Carmen
Hewitt, Chad L.
Campbell, Marnie L.
Journal name ICES Journal of Marine Science
Volume number 72
Issue number 3
Season March/April
Start page 1078
End page 1091
Total pages 14
Publisher Oxford University Press
Place of publication Oxford, Eng.
Publication date 2015-03
ISSN 1054-3139
1095-9289
Keyword(s) ballast water
biofouling
biological invasions
developing countries
Indonesia
risk management
Summary We evaluated two risk models (bioregion pathway and species-based exposure), with the aim to determine an effective strategy to implement marine biosecurity risk management in regions/countries where biological data are limited. We used the Port of Tanjung Priok, Jakarta Bay, Indonesia, as a case study to test both models. The bioregion pathway model illustrates that Tanjung Priok is highly connected to the East Asian Sea (∼91%), and the Northwest Pacific, Mediterranean, and Australia & New Zealand bioregions (“Very Low” risk), with other bioregions posing “Negligible” risk, highlighting the importance of understanding regional port linkages. The bioregion pathway model strength is grounded by using readily available shipping data; however, it does not classify species into threat categories but considers a larger number of species as an increasing threat. The species exposure model found that 51 species pose a theoretical risk (10 “Moderate”, 20 “High”, and 21 “Extreme” risks) to Tanjung Priok. These 51 species can be used as a “watch list” for this port. If biosecurity measures for this port were restricted to the outcomes of the bioregion pathway model only 4 of the 51 species highlighted by the species exposure model would have been captured. The species model was data intensive, requiring extensive species datasets and consequently may be unsuitable when data are limited
Language eng
DOI 10.1093/icesjms/fsu236
Indigenous content off
HERDC Research category C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal
Free to Read? Yes
Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30140634

Connect to link resolver
 
Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved.

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.

Versions
Version Filter Type
Citation counts: TR Web of Science Citation Count  Cited 9 times in TR Web of Science
Scopus Citation Count Cited 10 times in Scopus
Google Scholar Search Google Scholar
Access Statistics: 43 Abstract Views, 1 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics
Created: Wed, 05 Aug 2020, 13:33:23 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.