Assessment of the web-based audience response system socrative for biomedical science revision classes McKenzie, Matthew and Ziemann, Mark 2020, Assessment of the web-based audience response system socrative for biomedical science revision classes, International Journal of Educational Research Open, pp. 1-6, doi: 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100008. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads ziemann-assessment-2020.pdf Published version application/pdf 1.37MB 5 Title Assessment of the web-based audience response system socrative for biomedical science revision classes Author(s) McKenzie, Matthew orcid.org/0000-0001-7508-1800 Ziemann, Mark orcid.org/0000-0002-7688-6974 Journal name International Journal of Educational Research Open Article ID 100008 Start page 1 End page 6 Total pages 6 Publisher Elsevier Place of publication Amsterdam, The Netherlands Publication date 2020-09-04 ISSN 2666-3740 Keyword(s) Audience response Audience participation Online interaction Revision Tertiary education Science education Summary Current generation audience response systems (ARSs) are powerful tools for enabling direct interaction between teacher and student. In this study, 3rd year Biomedical Science students were surveyed about their participation in two separate revision classes. The first revision class used a traditional verbal ‘question and answer’ format, while the second revision class used the ARS Socrative for digital interactive learning. Significantly, more students answered questions in the Socrative revision class, with a higher level of student ‘comfortableness’ to answer questions. While students found both revision class formats useful, more students ranked the Socrative class ‘extremely useful’ and felt ‘very satisfied’ with this class. There was also a strong positive correlation between how useful the students perceived the Socrative class with their satisfaction, highlighting the importance of a positive experience on student learning outcomes.Overall, students preferred the Socrative revision class and indicated it was their preferred style for future revision classes. In conclusion, online polling using ARSs is an effective way to enhance student engagement. Furthermore, it provides instant feedback to the teacher, allowing revision content to be customized in real-time to directly address the students’ learning requirements. Language eng DOI 10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100008 Indigenous content off HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal ERA Research output type C Journal article Copyright notice ©2020, The Author(s) Free to Read? Yes Use Rights Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30141598 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Built Environment School of Life and Environmental Sciences Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Link to full-text (open access)     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Wed, 09 Sep 2020, 14:54:08 EST Thu, 10 Sep 2020, 05:00:36 EST Thu, 10 Sep 2020, 08:07:18 EST Wed, 06 Jan 2021, 12:47:42 EST Thu, 07 Jan 2021, 05:02:53 EST Fri, 29 Jan 2021, 11:02:46 EST Fri, 29 Jan 2021, 11:05:37 EST Fri, 29 Jan 2021, 11:06:49 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 0 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 13 Abstract Views, 7 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Wed, 06 Jan 2021, 12:47:42 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.