Home-based or remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A rapid review Holland, AE, Malaguti, C, Hoffman, M, Lahham, A, Burge, AT, Dowman, L, May, Anthony, Bondarenko, J, Graco, M, Tikellis, G, Lee, JYT and Cox, NS 2020, Home-based or remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A rapid review, Chronic Respiratory Disease, vol. 17, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1177/1479973120952418. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads Title Home-based or remote exercise testing in chronic respiratory disease, during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond: A rapid review Author(s) Holland, AE Malaguti, C Hoffman, M Lahham, A Burge, AT Dowman, L May, Anthony orcid.org/0000-0002-4028-949X Bondarenko, J Graco, M Tikellis, G Lee, JYT Cox, NS Journal name Chronic Respiratory Disease Volume number 17 Start page 1 End page 18 Total pages 18 Publisher Sage Publications Place of publication London, Eng. Publication date 2020 ISSN 1479-9723 1479-9731 Keyword(s) Exercise test lung diseases rehabilitation home care services telemedicine Summary © The Author(s) 2020. Objectives: To identify exercise tests that are suitable for home-based or remote administration in people with chronic lung disease. Methods: Rapid review of studies that reported home-based or remote administration of an exercise test in people with chronic lung disease, and studies reporting their clinimetric (measurement) properties. Results: 84 studies were included. Tests used at home were the 6-minute walk test (6MWT, two studies), sit-to-stand tests (STS, five studies), Timed Up and Go (TUG, 4 studies) and step tests (two studies). Exercise tests administered remotely were the 6MWT (two studies) and step test (one study). Compared to centre-based testing the 6MWT distance was similar when performed outdoors but shorter when performed at home (two studies). The STS, TUG and step tests were feasible, reliable (intra-class correlation coefficients >0.80), valid (concurrent and known groups validity) and moderately responsive to pulmonary rehabilitation (medium effect sizes). These tests elicited less desaturation than the 6MWT, and validated methods to prescribe exercise were not reported. Discussion: The STS, step and TUG tests can be performed at home, but do not accurately document desaturation with walking or allow exercise prescription. Patients at risk of desaturation should be prioritised for centre-based exercise testing when this is available. Language eng DOI 10.1177/1479973120952418 Indigenous content off Field of Research 1102 Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology 1103 Clinical Sciences HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal Free to Read? Yes Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30143646 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Link to full-text (open access)     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Fri, 09 Oct 2020, 07:17:53 EST Sat, 10 Oct 2020, 04:01:34 EST Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 05:09:41 EST Mon, 08 Feb 2021, 12:42:06 EST Mon, 08 Feb 2021, 12:43:42 EST Mon, 08 Feb 2021, 15:05:28 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 2 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 10 Abstract Views, 0 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Fri, 09 Oct 2020, 07:17:53 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.