The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis Jones, RA, Lawlor, ER, Birch, JM, Patel, MI, Werneck, AO, Hoare, E, Griffin, SJ, van Sluijs, EMF, Sharp, SJ and Ahern, AL 2021, The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis, Obesity Reviews, pp. 1-18, doi: 10.1111/obr.13150. Attached Files Name Description MIMEType Size Downloads hoare-impactofadult-2020.pdf Published version application/pdf 1.17MB 5 Title The impact of adult behavioural weight management interventions on mental health: A systematic review and meta-analysis Author(s) Jones, RA Lawlor, ER Birch, JM Patel, MI Werneck, AO Hoare, E orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-0221 Griffin, SJ van Sluijs, EMF Sharp, SJ Ahern, AL Journal name Obesity Reviews Article ID obr.13150 Start page 1 End page 18 Total pages 18 Publisher Wiley Place of publication Hoboken, NJ Publication date 2021 ISSN 1467-7881 1467-789X Keyword(s) interventions mental health obesity weight management Science & Technology Life Sciences & Biomedicine Endocrinology & Metabolism RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL LIFE-STYLE INTERVENTION QUALITY-OF-LIFE LOSS PROGRAM PSYCHOLOGICAL OUTCOMES OBESE INDIVIDUALS OVERWEIGHT WOMEN CARE ASSOCIATION Summary There is good evidence that behavioural weight management interventions improve physical health; however, the impact on mental health remains unclear. We evaluated the impact of behavioural weight management interventions on mental health‐related outcomes in adults with overweight or obesity at intervention‐end and 12 months from baseline. Eligible studies were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster RCTs of adult behavioural weight loss interventions reporting affect, anxiety, binge eating, body image, depression, emotional eating, quality of life, self‐esteem and stress. We searched seven databases from inception to 7 May 2019 and included 43 articles reporting 42 RCTs. Eighteen studies were deemed to be at high risk of bias. We conducted random‐effects meta‐analyses, stratified analyses and meta‐regression using Stata. Interventions generated greater improvements than comparators for depression, mental health‐related quality of life and self‐efficacy at intervention‐end and 12 months from baseline. There was no difference between groups for anxiety, overall quality of life, self‐esteem or stress at intervention‐end. There was insufficient evidence to assess the impact on anxiety, binge eating, body image, emotional eating, affect, life satisfaction, self‐esteem or stress at intervention‐end and/or 12 months from baseline. Although evidence suggests that interventions benefit some aspects of mental health, high‐quality, transparently reported RCTs measuring a range of mental health outcomes over longer durations are required to strengthen the evidence base. Notes In press Language eng DOI 10.1111/obr.13150 Indigenous content off Field of Research 11 Medical and Health Sciences 17 Psychology and Cognitive Sciences HERDC Research category C1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal Copyright notice ©2020, The Authors Free to Read? Yes Use Rights Persistent URL http://hdl.handle.net/10536/DRO/DU:30144908 Document type: Journal Article Collections: Faculty of Health School of Medicine Open Access Collection Related Links Link Description Link to full-text (open access)     Unless expressly stated otherwise, the copyright for items in DRO is owned by the author, with all rights reserved. Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au. Versions Version Filter Type Thu, 05 Nov 2020, 07:33:51 EST Fri, 06 Nov 2020, 04:01:03 EST Fri, 06 Nov 2020, 06:22:37 EST Sat, 09 Jan 2021, 01:41:32 EST Tue, 12 Jan 2021, 05:22:27 EST Thu, 25 Feb 2021, 14:12:29 EST Thu, 25 Feb 2021, 14:14:43 EST Filtered Full Citation counts:   Cited 0 times in TR Web of Science Cited 0 times in Scopus Search Google Scholar Access Statistics: 23 Abstract Views, 5 File Downloads  -  Detailed Statistics Created: Thu, 05 Nov 2020, 07:33:51 EST

Every reasonable effort has been made to ensure that permission has been obtained for items included in DRO. If you believe that your rights have been infringed by this repository, please contact drosupport@deakin.edu.au.