Remaining Open to Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Method Designs: An Unscientific Compromise, or Good Research Practice?11Author note: This paper is based on the Doctoral Research of Keith R. McVilly, which was recognized with Australian Psychological Society's 2005 Thesis Award for a thesis in the field of human relationships...

Mcvilly, KR; Stancliffe, RJ; Parmenter, TR; Burton-Smith, RM

Remaining Open to Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Method Designs: An Unscientific Compromise, or Good Research Practice?<sup>1</sup>1Author note: This paper is based on the Doctoral Research of Keith R. McVilly, which was recognized with Australian Psychological Society's 2005 Thesis Award for a thesis in the field of human relationships...

chapter

posted on 2024-06-12, 15:05 authored by KR Mcvilly, RJ Stancliffe, TR Parmenter, RM Burton-Smith

Remaining Open to Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed-Method Designs: An Unscientific Compromise, or Good Research Practice?<sup>1</sup>1Author note: This paper is based on the Doctoral Research of Keith R. McVilly, which was recognized with Australian Psychological Society's 2005 Thesis Award for a thesis in the field of human relationships...

History

Related Materials

1.
DOI - Is version of https://doi.org/10.1016/S0074-7750(07)35005-2

Publication classification

B1.1 Book chapter

Volume

35

Pagination

151-203

ISSN

0074-7750

ISBN-13

9780123662347

ISBN-10

0123662346

Publisher

Elsevier

Title of book

International Review of Research in Mental Retardation

Usage metrics

Keywords

Uncategorised value