posted on 2005-01-01, 00:00authored byJ McLennan, Alina Holgate, M Omodei, A Wearing
Large scale bushfire (or wildfire) suppression activities are conducted under the control of an Incident Management Team (IMT) comprising four major functions: Command, Operations, Planning, and Logistics. Four methodologies were used to investigate processes determining the effectiveness of IMT decision making activities: (a) laboratory experiments using the Networked Fire Chief computer simulation program; (b) analyses of reports of significant fires; (c) structured interviews with experienced IMT staff; and, (d) cognitive ethnographic studies of IMTs. Three classes of team processes were found to be important determinants of IMT effectiveness: information sharing and management; matching of the four component function goals to overall IMT goals; and monitoring of the overall IMT situation to detect and correct task disruptive processes. Several non-rational processes with the potential for hindering IMT effectiveness were noted. Team metacognition emerged as a key process for understanding effective IMT decision making.
History
Event
Australian Psychological Society. Conference (40th : 2005 : Melbourne, Vic.)
Pagination
183 - 187
Publisher
Australian Psychological Society
Location
Level 11, 257 Collins Street, Melbourne, VIC 3000
Place of publication
Melbourne, Vic.
Start date
2005-09-28
End date
2005-10-02
ISBN-13
9780909881276
ISBN-10
0909881278
Language
eng
Publication classification
E1 Full written paper - refereed
Editor/Contributor(s)
M Katsikitis
Title of proceedings
Proceedings of the 40th APS Annual Conference 28 September - 2 October 2005, Melbourne Vic : past reflections, future directions