posted on 2005-01-01, 00:00authored byPaul Nicholson, A McDougall
Cun-ent rhetoric around the use of 'eLearning' in Higher Education relates particularly to Internet-based flexible eLearning programs that focus on sustaining particular communities of practice. In this paper we argue that this contempormy view of what eLearning comprises arises from a lack of historical perspective on what the focus of educational eLearning programs has been over the past 40 years. Contemporary descriptions of eLearning as a 'new mode of learning' are fallacious and ignore its 40-year evolution from 1: 1 localised didactic models (both constmctivist and behaviourist) to many-to-many distributed social-constmctivist learning models. In addition, the historic divide between Education and Training has led to both the concurrent development of different notions, foci, and labels for technology-enhanced learning in different contexts and situations, and different conceptual origins arising in acquisitive and participatory learning metaphors. We argue that a more inclusive and historically aware conceptual framework is needed to be able to accurately describe what the full repertoire 'eLearning' really embraces<br>
History
Location
Cape Town, South Africa
Language
eng
Publication classification
E1 Full written paper - refereed
Editor/Contributor(s)
J Pittman
Pagination
1 - 6
Start date
2005-07-04
End date
2005-07-07
ISSN
0741-9058
Title of proceedings
WCCE 2005 : 8th IFIP World Conference on Computers in Education: 40 years of computers in education: what works?
Event
IFIP world conference on computers in education (8th : 2005 : Cape Town, South Africa)